xmas2003 writes: I'm somewhat embarrassed to admit that I have CNN on my news' bookmarks, since while they offer a quick look at the current news, their increasingly sensationalistic reporting leaves a bit to be desired. I almost exclusively would just look at print stories as their videos reporting is long-winded fluff... a very low bandwidth way of consuming news. Plus hosts such as Piers Morgan and Jeanne Moos are just grating to listen to.
And since it is an election year, Internet surfers can "cast" a vote for Obama, Romey, or THE INCREDIBLE HULK. Right now, the Green Party candidate has a slight lead over Romney and then Obama... although there has been quite a bit of ballot stuffing going on. Surf on by Halloween Night to see all the trick-or-treaters (online starting at 5:00PM MDT) and help put a Big Green Monster in the White House."
xmas2003 writes: ExtremeTech has an interesting piece about
how big are porn websites.
They get some actual traffic/bandwidth data from
YouPorn.Com (only NSFW link here)
which I'm sure has plenty of
in their 100 Terabyte archive of porn.
Every day, they handle over 100 million page views and almost a
Petabyte of data transfer — one metric says this is about
10x of Slashdot.
While Sebastian Anthony has some fun with the subject matter — "While it's difficult domain to penetrate... hard numbers are few and far between" — he plays it straight and provides some interesting facts about some of the most trafficked parts of the internet which present some
real scalability challenges (PPT preso) using software such as Redis & Nginx.
It's certainly a complicated industry as outlined in the
Geek-Kings of Smut.
Some/.'ers who also have UV vision commented this can be quite annoying at black-lit Disney Rides, Halloween Haunted Houses, etc. Fortunately for me, it's just an interesting oddity so far. Along those lines, some interesting related stories about using UV vision during World War II and Star Gazing. Finally, many/most people end up getting vision debilitating cataracts, so my experience having a Crystalens implanted after cataract surgery may be informative."
Nifty pictures of the crazy christmas display can be seen on the Christmas Blog (notice Clifford Stoll's "The Cuckoo's Egg" in post #220) plus watch videos of it in action with comedic history.
Nothing quite says Christmas like a giant HULK inflatable wearing a Santa Hat... along with three wise men of Elmo, SpongeBob, and Homer Simpson — D'OH!
The Slashdot Effect of turning 21,000 Christmas lights ON & OFF this evening should provide quite a Christmas Eve show to Alek's neighbors... and also the International Space Station."
xmas2003 writes: "I recently had Cataract Surgery with a Crystalens implant. With my cloudy yellowing (UV-filtering) natural lens removed, I see the world in a new light (more on that in a moment) as everything is brighter and colors are more vivid... plus in focus.
As a typical/. reader, I've been myopic since childhood, so it's wonderful not to have to wear glasses/contacts for distance.
One interesting oddity is that I can now see Ultraviolet light — it seems that there are a few people who have photoreceptors sensitive below 400nm into the UV spectrum. I've done some testing with a Black Light and UV filter to confirm this but would love to do more conclusive testing such as using a Monochromator — anyone in the Boulder, Colorado area have access to one? And any suggestions from/. readers on how I can further explore this phenomena?
So while "I can't see dead people", I guess I have a "superpower"... although I'm not sure a middle-aged suburbanite Dad should don purple tights and cape to become a crime-fighter!;-)"
xmas2003 writes: As a long-time reader of News for Nerds, I fit the "profile" in a number of ways — including being myopic since childhood... but fortunately for me, this was correctable with glasses or contacts. Around age 40, it started becoming more difficult to do close-up tasks (such as using vi to edit Perl code;-) as Presbyopia showed up right "on time" — I'm sure many older/. readers can relate.
But at age 46, a cataract started to obscure my vision which was no longer correctable — bummer to have this happen a few decades early. After extensive research on the various options (mono focal, multi-focal, accommodating, etc.), I opted for Cataract Surgery with a Crystalens implant.
Millions of Cataract Surgeries are done annually, so I figured my (overly analytical) writeup plus visual examples might be of interest to some/. readers who may (or will) be dealing with the same issue. Plus I'm sure many have gone through this process and can chime in with their experience/recommendations.
I had the first eye done last Monday and have been updating the web page — so far, so good. The eye doctor will "poke a hole" in my second eye this Monday — wish me luck!;-)
I have some nifty pictures of baby hummingbirds that seem popular since several hundred people look at it every day. So a little while ago, I added the Google +1 button in-line with the buttons from Facebook (2,452 likes), Stumble (35,000 views), and Twitter (147 tweets)... and so far, the big "G's" button has been pushed ZERO times.
Are web surfers just not used to seeing the latest web button, or is this a sign that Google is a little late to the social networking craze?
xmas2003 writes: Since 2005, I've had a live webcam watching my grass grow — another is currently watching a bird nest on my front door — five babies! While I appreciate the 802.11g wireless and Pan/Tilt/Zoom (10x optical) of the 5 year old D-Link DCS-6620g, it has issues, especially image quality. I've investigated getting a new webcam, but except for high-end/security-related gear from companies such as Axis, there doesn't seem to be much improvement in the consumer space as most offerings are just cheaper and USB connected for tethered video conferencing, etc.
I have an 18 Megapixel Canon 7D DSLR that shoots gorgeous 1920x1080x30p hi-def video. While I don't expect that in a consumer webcam, their recently released T2i uses the same chip and sells for $800. And heck, point-n-shoots are a couple of hundred bucks and now many cell phones have cameras built in, so there's plenty of low power speedy CPU's in small packages these days to handle the signal processing.
So why hasn't someone taken a sensor with good image quality sensor, downsized to around 1024x768, and put it in a PTZ webcam package with 802.11n wireless for around $500?