No F35 variant is VTOL.
Well... except for the STOVL variant. It's not normally used, but it is most definitely capable of VTOL.
The bigger issues with this may be that it causes the laser to bounce back into the lens which asfaik can cause damage to the lens.
Why would a bouncing infrared laser hurt the lens that the laser beam just passed through??? The other end of the laser tube is another IR mirror. There is no ill effect of having the beam bounce back directly down the path.
Dont even do that. Paint it white.
White paint would have no effect unless of course it was "titanium white" in which the titanium would be a relfector. The rest of it would simply vaporize away. This isn't a little laser pointer we're talking about... it's a 40 watt CO2 laser... that has a wavelength of 10600 nm. That's a far longer wavelength than the ~800 you can see in the near infrared and will be absorbed in quite a few materials you think are good optical reflectors. Using a rough metal shield would be the best thing to have. (Smooth metal shields tend to be infrared mirrors... which wouldn't exactly help the issue.)
The largest antitrust fine to date [nabarro.com]: €992M, on a cartel of lift makers within the EU.
Bullshit. The largest antitrust fine to date: €1.06B, was on Intel, for abusing its dominance in the computer chip market.
Just go with the flow control, roll with the crunches, and, when you get a prompt, type like hell.