Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Conflation of issues (Score 1) 373

Yet, I've also found that those who rail the most against the hierarchies and authority frequently seem to be the ones who need the most oversight to get anything accomplished. Ironic?

Not exactly ironic. The problem is finding authority and hierarchies that treat those above and beneath them with equal levels of respect and have the understanding that each job has a role to play in reaching the intended goal. Very often in hierarchial systems the first thing to go is communication between different levels -- directions and orders go top to bottom, but information needed from bottom to top does not flow freely. The net result is frustration from the rank and file because the bureaucracy is hindering their ability to be recognized for their efforts and/or observations.

Maybe you just THINK you're doing it well. Being late to a shift/work IS a big deal (if consistently so). It's pretty selfish to think otherwise. You're absolutely right that we are living in an "accelerated" world and that a lot of older practices are obsolete and diminishing as we speak. The inward facing solipsism you express is troubling though--ever think that there might be value in other ways of working, other people's viewpoints, beyond your preconceived notions of how the World 2.0 ought to work?

Okay, first, I KNOW I'm doing it well. But I'm an atypical example: I worked software deployment for a Fortune100 company; approximately 100k desktops, 5k servers. My biggest job challenge wasn't the technology but sorting out and prioritizing information coming in from dozens of departments and having only a very limited staff to do the work. The staff under me was, unfortunately, exactly the kind of person you're describing: Under 25 types with no real-world training. I made it work anyway, but it was the hardest job of my life. Multi-tasking is a learned skill. And the most important aspect of succeeding at it is being able to shut out external distractions in spurts and then redirect and move in an entirely new direction after a quick re-evaluation in between those times. The World v2.0 ought to work pretty similar to how The World v1.0 works: But without the social barriers that existing social framework encourages. We still need leaders, and we still need a hierarchy. But what we don't need is dominant/submissive pairings: We need to understand that just because someone is higher up the ladder does not make them any more important than those farther down. If we can do away with that attitude, information will flow from bottom to top, and the cycle will be restored thus radically improving efficiency. Also, in World 2.0, peer groups that come together to solve a problem with each person fluidly moving into different positions within the hierarchy will be more prevalent.

Our generation has an horrible weakness: Actually getting things done

I'd disagree. We can get things done, if given the right environment. We thrive on less judgmental and open atmospheres, which aren't common in hierarchial organizations. Thus, the perception we get nothing done, when the reality is that like any plant starved of basic nutrients... it doesn't grow.

Comment Re:Call it whatever you want (Score 1) 90

I'm just glad they're finally taking this sort of shit seriously.

Very humorously ironic post.

The whole cyber command thing bugs me because its so expensive but does so little. I'm sure they'll have a huge command of generals and various other officers giving each other endless powerpoints about "synergisticly proactively defending the cyber battlefield". Trust me, no patches are going to get applied. Mostly a bunch of resume stuffing for the post-military career. Probably a lot of puzzling over how it could be that the more managers they put on the job, the slower the work gets done. Probably a lot of really pompous posing going on too, I'm leet, so leet, its classified and I can't tell you how leet I am, but trust me I'm just the most leet ever. And a lot of "I'm working so hard that you wouldn't believe it, but its all classified so I can't actually tell you what I'm working on" as he returns to his minesweeper game. I guarantee they'll have a vaguely NORAD like NOC 24x7 with dim lights and big screen TVs, with very expensive software to monitor ... their departmental intranet, and maybe they'll have isc.sans.org on refresh every 30 seconds to see whats going on, maybe, but that would probably be too clueful.

All they need to do, is get more admins, more equipment, and tell them to keep up with the times, read slashdot, whatever. The last thing they need is infinitely more commanders and procedures to gum up the works even worse.

I thought we are already doing that now? Fact is, it's the enlisted who look at the officers like the morons they really are when it comes to executing and implementing any IT system. More often than not, the mantra is, "You want me to do what sir? Okay, if you say so..." Of course our enlistment contracts end and we get out into the real world.

Slashdot Top Deals

"The following is not for the weak of heart or Fundamentalists." -- Dave Barry