Once. Most just don't work so well after that.
Once. Most just don't work so well after that.
Very impressive footage, although I would have loved to see the initial ignition and the fadeing at the end.
What I'd also like to know is if igniting rockets such as these horizontally, with this amount of thrust, would have any measurable impact on the earths rotation at all. If not, what amount of thrust would be needed to do this?
I'm sure all US citizens will soon have to comply with the new Network Distribution Privacy Act (due to be announced soon) which means allowing at least one, or when required for coverage, two 71GHz transceivers in every room of their private property. When multiple operators are active in your region that will of course double or more. Service personnell must have unrestricted access to ensure full network coverage at all times.
People, stop the madness. Go out, leave your phone at home, get a life.
European here. Contrary to your belief (as probably induced by the somewhat biased media reports), many European civilians are not mourning at all. Many of us are happy to finally see EU dictatorship come to a halt. The Brits will do fine outside the EU. And so will many other countries.
EU is a failed project, perhaps good for the elite and large companies, but it sucks for ordinary citizens. Unlimited import of society-wrecking hordes, unreal money pits, total neglect for ordinary citizens, destruction of carefully crafted wellfare systems, pensions down the drain, job losses, and mind-boggling burocracy. That's EU for us. This project should return to being an economic powerhouse, without the common currency and without tens of thousands of useless, overpaid burocrats.
The Brits have taken the lead. Will it hurt? Sure! But better to cut the ties now then to stay aboard a ship heading for the cliffs. I expect other countries to follow. The Clash had this in their lyrics: "If I go there will be trouble.. If I stay it will be double!!"
I don't care much about religion, regardless which variety. But I do not consider islam to be a religion. It is an ideology, an all-encompassing view on how civilization should be ran. And it is totally incompatible with our civilization. It is out to infiltrate and destroy our civilization.
Muslims are the result of islam. They are inspired by their sick ideology. Muslims don't get born as killers, they get turned into killers by the brain-poison that islam is. Islam is the root. Remove and ban the root. If you prevent people from being exposed to islam, perhaps you can stop them from becoming muslim, and they won't be killers.
Perhaps the world should wake up and realize that the problem isn't muslims.
Wake up! The problem is islam. The ideology is toxic, dangerous and totally incompatible with Western civilization.
So rather than close the borders, close up islam. Close the hate-temples, forbid their religious practices, ban koran, just do not facilitate islam in any way. Stop allowing islam in our sociëty. World-wide. Those who can't live without it, will have to go find a country where it's allowed.
"It is just a way...." Really? REALLY??!? What the h*ll is Microsoft thinking.
Their compiler should do one thing and one thing only. Take the source and translate its instructions into machine code, so the computer performs the instructions as described in the source.. Nothing less. Nothing more. They have NO excuse whatsoever to include extra stuff to their benefit. Just that fact that you defend this behaviour is scary.
In their effort to make things ever easier for consumers, and to improve time-to-market, manufacturers skip the most basic security best practices.
This will kill the IOT market in general. Ever more gadgets with ever weaker security.
I guess you haven't looked. Plenty of 8" drives and floppy's on offer there.
This is a feeble attempt to downplay the incident. They simply don't know yet. So the guy says "It might as well have been a plastic bag" and the next headlines are "Plastic bag mistaken for drone", "Drone incident is plastic bag".
Interesting to see that so many Anonymous Cowards try to tell me I'm wrong. If you have a point to make, why not log in?
But that aside, please read again my assertion. My assertion is that religion is worse for your health than porn. Nowhere do I claim that there's nothing worse than religion. Now read again your 'proof'. Total bogus
I think religion, all of them, is a sick fantasy, some way for dumb people to deal with things they either have no control over, or do not understand. I also think that is there happens to be some supreme being and it happens to be one that matches a current religion, that he/she/it is a sadistic creep for letting the mass murder and torture in his/her/its name to persist.
All indications I have show that religion in various forms is a lot worse for your health than porn will ever be. It kills every day, and if it doesn't kill you today, at least causes serious lack of judgement and deformed perception of reality.
Perhaps the Senator should reset his priorities and fix the religion issue first? The world will be a better place without religion, thank you.
Any ARM processor can encrypt and decrypt data at plenty speed and next to no latency. A Raspberry Pi Zero at $5 is more than enough. The processor in your smartphone is plenty. Even if it isn't and they had to 'splurge' for a multi-core Intel CPU it would be like $100 or so. There is no excuse, none whatsoever, to leave encryption out to save a few bucks.
I'm sorry but this is exactly the uninformed hyperbole that hampers progress in nucleair energy. Modern nucleair technology uses what we call 'waste' today as very usable fuel and thurn it into much less hazerdous waste. It is people like you who stand in the way of fixing nucleair energy and actually *dealing* with the current waste problem.
I would love to see lots more focus on nucleair energy for multiple reasons. First, it can be a safe and clean energy source for many years to come (think Thorium, MSR). The 'oh it will blow up' folks are hampering progress with outdated arguments. Most current power plants are the Ford Model T of designs. If their arguments would have been lodged against cars then we'd still be driving those. Modern nucleair reactors are inherently safe and can fix many of the waste issues we have from outdated installations today.
Second is removing the dependency on fossil fuels. Not only will this have positive environmental effects, it will cause a paradigm shift in geo politics. Can you imagine what happens to the Middle East if their stronghold on oil supply becomes irrelevant? When organisations such as Al Quaida and IS see their money supply dry up? It will be a much, much better world for it.
Anything free is worth what you pay for it.