Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:Retailers are holding us in the stone age (Score 1) 311

I don't know about you, but I hate it when I'm forced to change credit card numbers due to fraud being detected on the old number.

Getting to the state where cards can't be skimmed is a good thing for consumers. It should also reduce the costs of goods marginally where there are only card present sales as the merchant fees should be reduced.

You can't get to a state where cards can't be skimmed until all the point of sale equipment has been upgraded to support chips. This takes time and the US is at the end of the line in doing this.

Comment Re:How is this patentable? (Score 1) 84

So you remembered being annoyed. You most probably also thought "wouldn't it be nice if it could reset it self automatically". That makes the concept obvious. So obvious that even some not skilled in the arts could think of it. Now how you achieve that may or not be obvious.

There is also the "will it being me enough extra sales" to be worth spending time you figure out how to do it.

It's much like how I shouldn't have to set the time on the gps to the local time. We have timezone databases. We have maps which describe the boundaries of a time zone and we have the current location. That gives you all you need to set the time on a gps to the local time.

Or wouldn't it be nice if the speed warning on gps's took into account school zone and hours of operation.

Or wouldn't it be nice if time of day turn restrictions could be taken into account when route planning.

The latter two really need the first to be implemented to be fully automated.

Comment Re:In before... (Score 1) 150

Actually RFC 6269 dis-endorses NAT. RFC 6269 provides the least worst form for those that irrationally just have to have NAT.

For reasons discussed in [RFC2993] and Section 5, the IETF does not
recommend the use of Network Address Translation technology for IPv6.
Where translation is implemented, however, this specification
provides a mechanism that has fewer architectural problems than
merely implementing a traditional stateful Network Address Translator
in an IPv6 environment. It also provides a useful alternative to the
complexities and costs imposed by multihoming using provider-
independent addressing and the routing and network management issues
of overlaid ISP address space. Some problems remain, however. The
reader should consider the alternatives suggested in [RFC4864] and
the considerations of [RFC5902] for improved approaches.

Comment Re:Towns/Cities are to blame (Score 1) 160

When you hire a machine you pay for:

* Buying the machine and the truck needed to get it to the job site
* Keeping the machine and truck maintained
* Insurance of all types: liability, WC, on the equipment and truck, etc
* Taxes (payroll / business / etc.) for the hire company
* Accounting / bookkeeping services to take care of the above
* Rent or mortgage for an office / shop to house all of the above
* (Finally) a profit margin for the hire company

The only difference is the labour costs.

Comment Re:They disrupeed our plans! We want blood! (Score 1) 131

Even with IPv6 it doesn't identify a person. Modern stacks use short lived addresses, by default, for outgoing connections. All you get from IPv6 is a household the same as with IPv4.

IPv6 allows you to be able to uniquely address every machine. It doesn't require that every machine be reachable. It doesn't require that every machine uses there same address forever.

And by the way IPv6 is here. There is no need to wait.

Comment Re:Implementation was good though (Score 1) 92

No the form does not record her contact information. The only contact information was mine.

The relationship information however is not collectable unless you enter the people in the household in specific orders. i.e. the form was poorly defined as there were no instructions as far as I could see about entering people in specific orders.

Comment Re:Implementation was good though (Score 2) 92

30+ hours to get your password / receipt emailed to you. 20 minutes, maybe 1 hour is acceptable.

Started my census return on the 12th at 17:05 and requested the password be emailed to me.
The password email was sent by the ABS servers in the 14th at 03:50.

If I was depending upon the password to resume doing the census I would have had to wait an additional day.

Additionally the forms really didn't handle doing "Father", "Daughter", "Wife". Had to go and delete all the data entry for my daughter. Add my wife then re-add my daughter.

Slashdot Top Deals

As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know its true name. -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie