Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:They didn't tolerate intolerance (Score 1) 657

In this case it's a pretty clear demonstration that Bruce Perens has no better argument for his position than it's not literally illegal, yes. For some weird reason people who roll out the "first amendment only applies to government restrictions on speech" argument always think that it cuts the other way and proves the person they're replying to has no better argument than that, even when the argument they're replying to has nothing to do with the first amendment or the legality of restrictions on speech (which it generally doesn't). I blame xkcd.

Comment Re:They didn't tolerate intolerance (Score 1) 657

Speaking of countenancing deliberate lies, one of the supposed proofs that Palmer is an evil no-good Trump supporter is that he liked a Tweet by someone else criticizing CNN for lying about Trump, claiming he said "racial profiling" was a good way of stopping terrorism when he'd said nothing of the sort. The fight against Trump isn't about fighting deliberate lies at all, it's about an us-versus-them, and you have to countenance the correct lies about the enemy if you don't want to be seen as a supporter of them and potentially targeted for career destruction. And through it all, the people doing this insist that they're the ones fighting lies and that anyone who disagrees with their tactics is the real lie-supporter.

Comment Re:Even bad its good (Score 1) 86

I have an LG monitor and the backlight-dimming feature definitely does activate during fades to black in normal content, especially movies. I'm guessing that the "sports, comedies, dramas and news programming" that this organization chose to test these TVs just happened to have a lot less of those fades to black than a broader, more representative set of content would. Wonder who's paying their bills.

Comment Re:Proof that D-Wave is actually a Quantum Process (Score 2) 157

No, this proves that in some applications, D-Wave's machine offers considerable speedup over intentionally de-optimized alternatives. From the blog post:

We should note that there are algorithms, such as techniques based on cluster finding, that can exploit the sparse qubit connectivity in the current generation of D-Wave processors and still solve our proof-of-principle problems faster than the current quantum hardware.

In other words, the current D-Wave machine requires that problems have a particular, very restricted structure and they're only 10^8 times faster when competing with poorly-optimised solvers that don't take advantage of that special structure. if you use a properly optimised conventional solver, the D-Wave machine is actually slower. Google are hoping that future, more densely connected versions that don't exist yet will somehow retain the same speed while conventional code will get bogged down, but those don't exist and may never meet the performance promises that Google are hoping for.

Comment Re: Proof that D-Wave is actually a Quantum Proces (Score 1) 157

If I remember correctly, their test results for the previous chip were later demonstrated to be rather misleading. The previous chip was indeed faster at solving the particular problem class it was hardwired for than a particular general-purpose solver running on a conventional computer, but someone managed to come up with an optimised solver that was faster than D-Wave at solving the exact problem class D-Wave was made to solve, on a normal general-purpose PC. It's not clear if the same applies to the new chip.

Comment Re: There's more to EU transport than cheapness (Score 1) 341

Uber's business model relies heavily on drivers using their own, standard insurance and not bothering to ask questions about whether they're actually covered. I think Uber have started offering their own insurance and raised prices to pay for it since someone got killed by an Uber driver in the US, but it's still inadequate (apparently less than they're legally required to have in Germany, and at least in the US all their drivers are driving uninsured whenever they're seeking riders).

Comment Re:Just stop already (Score 1) 68

Don't forget that by default, Chrome now sends all your passwords back to Google encrypted only with a password that Google have easy access to. (Only if you're signed in to Chrome, but they're incredibly aggressive about signing you in, so much so I don't dare log into Google accounts from Chrome anymore.)

Comment Re:Chrome? (Score 1) 436

By that standard Google Chrome itself has been malware for years - many pieces of software have bundled it in exchange for money from Google and made it hard not to accidentally install it, including I think Java, Flash, and various more shady products, and Google hasn't given a fuck.

Comment Re:passive scan isn't perfect (Score 1) 127

Barring another bug, it can - and probably does - scan for *all* ways to exploit it. The issue is that Android itself doesn't properly verify the certificate chain in packages before installing them, and Play Services can easily perform all of the missing checks itself and reject any package that fails them.

Slashdot Top Deals

The price one pays for pursuing any profession, or calling, is an intimate knowledge of its ugly side. -- James Baldwin