Strange how reality doesn't match your argument...
Says the person talking about GMO wheat that has never been sold commercially anywhere ever.
...because their particular version is not per se to increase yields, but to have plants that resist Roundup get big doses of Roundup to kill other plants.
When your field is full of non-crop plants/weeds, all competing for the same resources and nutrients in your soils as your crops, your crop yield will necessarily be lower. By preventing weeds, you are increasing your yield by definition.
...because often it seems to be arms race with nature where farming tends to lose.
This is a more accurate assessment. Direct genetic engineering is simply the latest and most effective method of breeding.
No need for the likes of Monsanto to control the world.
So much lol here. I can't believe you people actually believe shit like this.
only you who feel entitled because you spent money
I'd say that someone who's spent money on a service is justifiably a hell of a lot more entitled than someone who hasn't spent and won't spend any money on said service.
The most important early product on the way to developing a good product is an imperfect version.