But I'd rather fund a new startup that fails, rather than fund the good-ol boy network that siphons money off the top to fund their retirement account.
Or they could refrain from confiscating people's hard earned money at gunpoint to hand out to favored group, whether it's the good-ol boy network or some green nonsense.
It's time for us to take a new look at this problem and find a way to solve it once and for all.
There are often waves when there is no wind
So, there's also often not.
and the court is generally bound to prior rulings unless overturned by new legislation.
Or the court overturns itself, which it usually reluctant to do, but certainly can be done.
In all likelihood, your lawyer would not have advised you about the possible implications of that clause since it is simply something that is not done.
IANAL, but that sounds like the sort of thing that would be legal malpractice.
Once the problem was evident, Schneider said they contacted Amazon Web Services at the end of April. Amazon acted in a professional way, the researchers said, by notifying those account holders of the security issues.
So it certainly was an issue until they looked into it (and still is an issue if some fraction of their users are too lazy to fix it).
I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but I can't prove it.