Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Not originaly PFC (Score 1) 469

> Its possible they cleared him as a Sgt before he got busted and didn't remove it.

Damn unlikely, getting any kind of negative action like that almost always gets all clearances yanked automatically.

Comment Re:Come on folks... (Score 4, Informative) 469

As a one-time A1C (USAF equivalent to a PFC) I can say from personal experience that far more sensitive information than that is quite often accessible to lower ranking personnel. That's not to say they aren't vetted first, but we don't have mind-reading machines yet and at that age the simple process of maturity, (and exposure to enough crap like this :), can bring about radical changes in perspective. Most people have enough (or are given enough) perspective even at that age that they can be trusted with sensitive information, but no screening process is perfect. If there's anything surprising here it is that A - we don't get more leaks like this, and B - that the screening is actually as effective as it is, (those are not mutually exclusive).

Comment Re:The real litmus test for this is (Score 1) 297

Mod parent up! Historically speaking, Christians are by far and away the most violent religious group. Not to say that anyone should be afraid of Christians - this is an excellent example of how things can be twisted out of proportion - "historically speaking", only the tiniest extremist fringe groups can be considered "violent" by any stretch of the imgination for the simple reason that by and large the greater majority of people are actually pretty decent folks just trying to get along. It's the rarified strata of megalomaniacs and tiny percentage of the population that's stupid and/or weak enough to follow them that we have to watch out for, they leverage the ignorance of the masses to dangerous effect. (Or, to put it another way, all of the world's problems are rooted in ignorance.)

Comment Re:Seatac had scanners galore but weren't using th (Score 2, Interesting) 297

Seatac is one of the few airports with TSA staff who have a reasonably sane approach to this BS. I've had two positive interactions with them recently.
      First was my young daughter being selected randomly for one of their more extreme searches. The TSA staffer who was on point for those clearly wasn't happy but grimaced and waved her over, ready to follow the rules no matter how insane. An apparently higher ranking TSA person stopped him though saying quietly, "C'mon, it's a little girl", with a bit of a look that made it clear she thought he was being a moron.
      The other time, also recent, we had forgotten we had some bottled water in the bottom of one of our backpacks and they found it at the x-ray machine. No problem though, they just examined it fairly closely and then let it pass.

Comment Old news? (Score 1) 478

I seem to recall reading about this many years ago. Not seeing anything on the web older than a few days though. As I recall it only happens under certain circumstances relating to the age of the snake and specific environmental factors including availability (or lack?) of food, temperature, humidity(?) etc.
      Anybody else hear this before?

Comment Re:Stoned (Score 1) 366

Or if you really want to get retro, (and remove any risk of propagation by netwok), get some DOS boot disks and the Pakistani Brain Virus.

(For history buffs: the first "real" PC virus evar, which I hand-disassembled on legal paper so I could write what might have been one of the first virus removal tools - a simple hex edit of the boot sector to skip over its code. :)

Oh, yeah, and get offa my lawn!

Comment Re:which 90% (Score 2, Insightful) 224

"...we needed to store ALL the account information, and we needed fast access to ALL of it ALL the time."

Which is why decent needs analysis is critical. In other situations that would not be the case.

I must say this line at the end of the article does more to reflect the ignorance of the author than anything else, "...why on earth did we squander so much money by not thinking this way until now?"
      Who is this "we", kemosabe? Smart IT people have been thinking this way since the dawn of computers. Think of the huge storage rooms of archive, (not backup!), tapes that were around back in the mainframe days. We might store a higher percentage of it online nowadays but there's still a brisk market in optical storage arrays, high-speed tape libraries, various utilities for automatic email and database record archiving etc etc

Comment Re:Can you be more precise ? (Score 2, Funny) 291

Here, let's just give him some answers:
- normalize everything for consistency
- denormalize everything for performance
- index only key fields for performance
- index everything for performance
- date index everything for logging purposes
- don't date index anything for performance reasons
- sanitize your inputs at the db level instead of the client for security and performance
- sanitize your inputs at the client level instead of the db for security and performance
- use Postgresql because MySQL sucks
- use MySQL because Postgresql sucks
- use [favorite db engine] because [some other engine] sucks

There, HTH!

Slashdot Top Deals

But it does move! -- Galileo Galilei