The alert provides a web form to write to your congress person. Please do that. And please put the alert up elsewhere, so that other people can help too.
I'm in Washington DC working on this today, and your support will help.
Oh man...am I tired of dealing with Adobe or what? ARRRRGGGGGGGG.... Talking to Adobe reps is like pulling teeth, except less fun. I ask them some simple questions like:
1. Can XDP be opened by the freely available Reader 7 software in a seamless way?
3. Can we please have the REAL documentation for XDP instead of the teaser-level documentation they have on their site?
4. Can we please take a look at XPAAJ documentation so that we can decide if we want it or not?
After a month of back and forth bullshit ping-pong with people who have NO CLUE about Adobe PDF (they seem to be salesmen who are completely non-technical), we still have no answer!
I am still trying to get some answers from Adobe. I don't understand why Adobe's documentation is so incomplete or misleading or ambiguous all over the place, and why they are so tight with the information. Yes... I know they are a proprietary vendor. But I think they can make way more money by being nice and forthcoming with their clients then by holding back on every last smidgen of information.
I am very frustrated, but I do honestly hope that Adobe will WAKE UP and change their attitude. I hope Adobe embraces true openness and really starts to offer a top-notch service. What is the point of paying for software when it is so shoddy (and Adobe PDF software is definitely not what I would call "polished" or "excellent" or "well documented") and when the company doesn't even want to talk to you in an honest way after you buy it? Sure, we didn't cough up a million bucks, but we hold many licenses for Adobe Pro..surely we deserve some semblance of honesty in communication. I mean, I think a person deserves an honest, open, and forthcoming answer under any circumstances, money or no money. But surely, even the greedy capitalist should be interested to help out his clients, right?
Wake up Adobe... Instead of treating your customers as enemies, why not treat them as allies? Instead of looking at us as marks that you can peg with progressively more and more expensive software, why not look at us as your partners? Try it Adobe.
Man I am tired. I feel like I've been frying on all sides for a long time. Yup I had a fun and wild life, but still... Is fun worth the stress and pain? I am not sure. I want to rest for a 100 years or so...maybe even a billion years. No more mandatory working. No more mandatory thinking. No more mandatory anything. Just rest. If I feel like doing a little something, then do it. Then rest again. For a long time. Yea... that's what I want, I believe. I can't be sure I don't want it until I try it.
I'd really appreciate it if you'd create a login on the site and submit articles. Especially original work, which hasn't always been well recieved on Slashdot - they seem to prefer linking to other people's coverage. RDF and RSS are available at http://technocrat.net/rdf and http://technocrat.net/rss, so you can keep track of articles from elsewhere.
My most recent episode was at the 9000 foot visitor station on Mauna Kea. The folks there said that I shouldn't attempt to drive up to the telescopes without a 4-wheel-drive vehicle. So, I went in the parking lot and accosted occupants of the first 4-wheel-drive vehicle that came by. The driver of said vehicle had seen me lecture in San Francisco. I got my ride.
Just by standing at that 9000 foot visitor station, I'd passed through the nerd filter.
Then, a few weeks ago, I happened to come upon a local radio club's ham radio field day operation while hiking in the woods with my wife. An co-worker from 10 years ago walked up. It turned out he'd just gotten his ham license.
This stuff happens all of the time. Of course it helps that I am somewhat recognizable in tech circles, so people who know of me tend to walk up, but on the other hand I am not that well known.
What are your experiences beyond the nerd filter?
It came to me today that some of what drove me to become well-known outside of our little circle was frustration with Slashdot.
I used to post here a lot, and Slashdot was where I sent most of my bulletins first. Then I started to be frustrated with the editorial policies, submissions being nuked in favor of less important stuff, the AC and troll situation, etc. So, I consciously looked around for other venues in which to publish. First, I started Technocrat.net, which was good (and which I intend to make work again) but didn't pick up more than about 5000 readers. Then I started sending stuff to ZDnet. Surprisingly, ZDnet was much more willing to publish my stuff than Slashdot had been, especially since I didn't want to get paid. After a while, I shifted to their sister publication CNET News.com . I also sent some things to The Register and other publications. All were very willing to publish my stuff. It turned out that Slashdot was much more willing to link to stuff that I'd written on CNET than it was to accept my postings directly, not that it mattered as much once that content was on CNET. I guess that fits the format - I guess Slashdot doesn't want to be a producer of original material - they want to be an aggregator of stuff published elsewhere.
During this time, I was also doing a lot of things that drew attention. Forming a VC firm, working for HP, doing my gig with the W3C patent policy board, etc. Being widely read helped me get to do these things, and doing these things made me more widely read. The press started calling me, and I developed good relationships with a lot of reporters. When I left HP, I got a half-page in the New York Times print business section, with a big photo.
I probably wouldn't be getting all of this press were it not for Slashdot "pushing me out of the cradle". I'm not sure, however, that this was good for Slashdot.
Top Ten Things Overheard At The ANSI C Draft Committee Meetings: (5) All right, who's the wiseguy who stuck this trigraph stuff in here?