Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×
Desktops (Apple)

Journal Journal: The whole "Macs are more expensive than PCs" Argument 1

Every time there is a /. article about Macs, inevitably the argument ensues that Macs cost more money than PCs. This has the side-effect of bringing out Apple & Microsoft fanatics on both sides.

I present to you today a simple idea: I am *glad* Macs cost more than PCs. God help us all the day the Mac costs the same or (shock! horror!) becomes cheaper.


It raises the bar for entry.

The old adage goes that "if you lay down with dogs you'll wake up with fleas." PC users deserve everything they get. They made their allegience early on. The companies they work for made those same allegience.

Let 'em continue to deal with spyware, trojans, pop-ups, and other malware, blue screens of death, crappy looking hardware and crappy working software. It's not Apple's fault that the PC industry hasn't had an innovation since Ctrl+Alt+Del.

I'm done comparing Macs to PCs. To me, a Mac is a Cadillac and a Dell is a Kia.

Both are not inherently *bad* car manufacturers.

Both have models that will get you to the store and back without many problems.

They both have air bags, anti-lock brakes, power steering, CD changers. One comes with XM Satellite radio, and the other can be easily fitted for one without too many problems.

One also costs $40,000 and the other $18,000.

However, after spending 8 hours working with one (or riding in one, driving, what have you), at the end you'll be less stressed and more comfortable with one than you will be with the other.

Few college students and most workers (when the average salary in this country is $40,000 a year anyway) can afford a Cadillac. It doesn't mean that the Cadillac brand should be dropped.

Something doesn't have to gain incredible market share for it to be successful. Just look at Farrari, Porsche, and Hummer.

No sir, you can keep your Dell. You can keep your Windows.

Personally, I don't *want* you to have a Mac. I don't want my favorite brand being diminished and commoditized.

Am I being smug? Hell yeah. I'm proud of it, too.

You see, what makes the Mac more valuable isn't its price, or even the computer itself.

It's the software that runs on it.

And no, I'm not talking about specifically OS X here, but the thousands of other pieces of software which there will never find an equivalent on Windows because Windows simply doesn't have the architecture to support the features.

Sofware like Circus Ponie's NoteBook, Intaglio, Audio Hijack Pro, Nisus Writer, OmniGraffle, Ulysses, Ecto, NetFlix Freak, etc.

I haven't even begun to touch on the "features".

So, all you Dell jockeys: continue on with what you're doing. Installing your 100MB of patches and hotfixes every 3 or 4 Tuesdays. Continue having to shut your machines down each night and reboot so your machines stay stable.

Continue living with 2 hour battery lifes on your laptops.

You'll get no argument from me. You have what you want and you got what you paid for.


Shut the fuck up.

The Internet

Journal Journal: Warning About ServerBeach

Here's a warning to current and potential ServerBeach customers:

ServerBeach tech support flat-out requires your box's root password before they will begin to troubleshoot. Per the following response from ServerBeach's Tech Support staff from a recent trouble-ticket of mine:

"If you wish us to investigate and correct your problem we will need
login credintials at the root level.

If you chose to provide them we will happily look into your problem.

As you are indicating you do not wish to provide them we are marking
this ticket resolved as we can do nothing for you."

In a reply to a complaint of mine to ServerBeach's tech-support manager, "Charnell," responded with: "You have every right to choose to not allow our support technicians access to your server, however in return they have every right not to provide support if they are limited in doing so."

Under normal circumstances, this would all be well and good, and if a customer was having problems getting Apache restarted say due to a configuration problem then I could perfectly understand.

However, the nature of my request (the first time I needed "real" support since I've been a customer) was a simple question. Plesk was doing something one way, I wanted it done another, and Plesk's documentation was ambiguous.

Contacting Plesk (SW-Soft) I was immediately referred to ServerBeach to answer my question. I did not have a configuration problem which was preventing Apache from starting, and aside from a minor annoyance everything was fine with the 70+ domains hosted on my box.

Ironically, after receiving the reply from ServerBeach's technical support, and after leaving a complaint with the tech-support manager, eighteen minutes later I received the answer I was looking for directly from Plesk and opening a new ticket with them and explaining that ServerBeach refused to provide assistance (Plesk's answer was spot-on, and without the need for my root login! Go figure.)

My boxes are locked down pretty tight (or at least as tight as I can make them given the infrastructure provided by ServerBeach). Root access isn't even available to anyone remotely and when needed requires something other than the standard PAM authentication modules which come out of the box with Linux and C2 (equivalent) security has been applied. (What? You think I'd actually *tell* you what it was? Hahaha.)

But, bottom line here though is that ServerBeach's policy of refusing to offer service without implicitly either requesting or receiving the root password is flawed.

It's flawed because in many instances the root password isn't even needed.

In addition, it's flawed because it exposes ServerBeach, and their customers, to increased risk and liability of something going wrong and getting accidentally fubar'ed.

Last, and this is the most important one to me, it's flawed because it unnecessarily exposes potentially confidential and proprietary information that may be on a customer's box to ServerBeach personnel.

Besides, ServerBeach always had their own "back-door" which they could have used at any time which, while I could have disabled it, I chose not to (other than locking down from which IP addresses and networks which could actually use it) because I, myself, may need that backdoor at some point in the unforeseen future.

So, if you are a current ServerBeach customer, or are considering becoming one, take this to heart! You may want to think twice about handing over your own login credentials willy nilly to an unsuspecting third-party.

But, for the record, I have been a customer now for 11 months and have generally been extremely satisfied with the level of service I have received. ServerBeach offers good value for the money in most cases. Perhaps this was just an isolated incident, but after receiving the reply that I did from "Charnell," I'm not so sure.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you had better tools, you could more effectively demonstrate your total incompetence.