Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×

Comment Re:RIGHTS, and contract law, and prior designation (Score 1) 552

> You don't have a right to a cellphone...

Yeah, you do.

You have a right to have a wallet/purse, right?
You have a right to belt/buckle, shoes, etc., right?

Don't make up things because you want to be argumentative. Cite some law.

What is on your person is your right unless lawfully prohibited (such as firearms when lawfully prohibited).

Cellphones unless lawfully prohibited* are allowed.

* Lawfully prohibited means prohibited by LAW, not because some halfwit said "NO you can't bring that in here!" If posted that's half the part. If prior informed to the ticket purchaser that's enough for me... but still not law.

Comment RIGHTS, and contract law, and prior designation (Score 1) 552

This is already spiraling... so pardon me for going on a tangent.

If it says on the TICKET THAT I PURCHASE that I'll be required to surrender/bag my cellphone then that's fine. I can choose to go or not go.

If it does not say so and I show up, the ITEMS ON MY PERSON are NOT SUBJECT TO SEARCH OR SEIZURE by agents of the government (4th am) or private parties without my agreement.

If they'll play fair (say so ahead of time) ... I'm fine with this. People who are willing to give up their rights are always happy and welcome to be the sheeple they are to go see awesome shows (Dave Chapelle, etc.). I'd rather keep my phone (silent, screen off, thanks).


Comment Jurisdiction? (Score 1) 99

Local mall. Local police. Why is the FBI in on this gig?

Yeah for sure they shouldn't get another bite at the [encryption debate] Apple... but why are they even involved and why won't someone say "Hey they have no standing here. This was a simple case of a stabbing and a shooting and it's all local and the FBI has NO JURISmyDICTION here!!!" ?


Comment AUTHENTICATION (and "no") (Score 1) 117

If they are an open-source hardware project but haven't released the spec, then THEY'RE NOT OPEN SOURCE.

If they release the hardware specs but sign their own hardware and don't release the key that's still fine.

They can then request anyone who wants "support" (the question in this /. posting) to provide authentication of OEM purchase.
No auth - no support. It could even be automated. Just like Motorola's "Can my device be unlocked?" site, they could have a
"do I have a Genuine OpenSourceHardwareProject Board eligible for support?" page.

Everything else is dissembling (that's the politician's word for LYING and EVADING).

Either they REALLY ARE OPEN-SOURCE HARDWARE PROJECT (no, right now they're not), or they are.


Comment CIDR, large memory, and bps(and baud) (Score 1) 125

Going from 32-bit addresses to 128-bit addresses at the outset would have meant the IMPs and then the NSFnet routers (Cisco AGS+s) would have had the routing tables take up 4x the space (well 257/65s but who's counting). That would have meant a more severe and quicker router memory exhaustion with backbone routes, and a quicker move to CIDR (where we specify NETWORK/NUMBER-OF-CONSECUTIVE-1-BITS instead of NETWORK/MASK).

For every choice we ever make (routers, IP design, freeway offramp selection, etc.) if the choice has no downside and an upside... we do it... because it's stupid not to. For most of the choices, however, there's a tradeoff of an upside and a downside. In the IPv4 design 32 bits was (in the late 1970s!!! long before PCs, smartphones, IoT, etc.) was assumed to be more IP addresses than anyone would want... which is why more than 1/4 of them were never made available for assignment (Class "D", Net10, Net26, Net127, etc. and RFC-1918 taken out because sysadmins left their boxes configured with mfg default IP addresses.)

I appreciate the contributions Vint Cerf made but I can tell you that running IPv4 on 9600bps modems (back then "MODEMs") meant that we tried to send LARGE packets to make the payload-to-header ratio high but then SHORT packets to make the "responsiveness" (latency) seem acceptable. If each packet header went from 40-64 bytes to 192 bytes larger... that ratio would have significantly impacted any "real-time" (low-latency) performance. That would have impacted those of us using TELNET (ssh not yet invented), accessing BBSs, BiX, Compuserve, etc.

It's wishful thinking to look at a world where our smartphones have 32GB of memory and our data communication speed are measured in 10s of Mbps and long wistfully to have designed the header structure of RFC-793 where computers had 64KBytes (not MBytes) and communication speeds of 110baud (1970s).

Ehud Gavron
Tucson AZ

Comment Yahoo is ... the story? (Score 1) 96

The big players moved to HTML5 ages ago. Yahoo is the latest example of a no-longer meaningful Internet property being auctioned off to whomever will buy it (Verizon Wireless). Its relevance passed years ago and what it does or does not do -- long after the industry has already moved there -- is not of any relevance.

I'm happy someone listens to their PR and submits slashdot stories about it. It would otherwise be a boring day without humorous articles.


Comment tripit already did it ;-) (Score 1) 38

I look forward to seeing Google's product in play -- they've done such an awesome job with most others (notable exceptions being Google+ and Hangouts).

I use tripit.com. It can accept forwarded email confirmations, sieve out important data, put it all together, and present it online or on the Android app to make everything convenient.

It tells me the arrival gate at the airport, the next gate for the connecting flight, and I get flight delays from it quicker than through the airline (SWA, DL, UA) own text messaging system.

I hope google is successful... they have a high bar to climb to beat tripit.com.

OB DISC: after using it for one week I bought the "pro" version to get even more info. I love it.
OB DISC2: I travel business/pleasure about 4 times a year...

Ehud Gavron
Tucson AZ US

Comment Ellison is a terrorist (Score 4, Interesting) 157

Larry Ellison is a sociopath http://www.canadianbusiness.co... who has singlehandedly done more damage to the software world https://www.wired.com/2014/05/... than any other man since software became a thing. His self-aggrandizing attention-seeking narcissism https://books.google.com/books... proves that when you have money and you're a dick the media still loves you.

Larry Ellison is a liar.

If he says Amazon's lead is over you can rest assured knowing that three things are true:
1. Amazon's lead is not over
2. Larry is hoping to create a self-fulfilling prophecy so that it will be true
3. He's going for the free PR that he's getting by saying outrageous thing. It's a Trump thing.

P.S. The subject line I wrote is "Ellison is a terrorist." Given all the explosives he's set off in Java, APIs, Harmony, etc. the man should be locked up.

Comment What was the problem? (Score 4, Insightful) 17

If the "problem" was "resolved" how about linking to a story that actually describes the problem?

This is slashdot. We want to read about computer things that break and how they get fixed, not get some PR person saying "It's all good now, come on over, the weather's clear." What's all good now? What broke? How do we learn from this so we don't have the same breakage. What did you learn from it so you don't experience breakage.

This could be a great learning experience. Sadly the link above doesn't provide that.


Comment If you're refusing a refund ... (Score 4, Insightful) 467

If you're refusing a refund to a player who hates your game after playing it for 50 hours...

You're the wrong person to be a decision maker.

- You made a game that someone hates after only two days
- After giving your game every chance in the world to live up to what the player expects, after 50 hours of play they can't stand it anymore and never want to play it again
- You defrauded (in the legal sense) consumers who bought your product expecting to get what they were told only to find they weren't.

This is not unusual for Sony https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... but it is just another example of a company that HATES ITS CUSTOMERS and wishes they would just SPEND MONEY AND SHUT UP.

I'm sorry, Sony. This is why I gave my PS3 away. This is why I will never ever buy your products.

Those players you've upset... they're not like me. They're fans of your products. They looked forward to this game.
Oops. Not any more.

Public corporations exist to improve shareholder value. Typically this is done with growth and sales. Good luck alienating all your customers and seeing those chickens come home to roost.

Ehud "Sony can kiss my arstechnica" Gavron
Tucson, AZ US

Comment SHUT THEM DOWN! (Score 2) 229

Yes, if you run a tor node and you don't want to keep it up, take it down. You should be removed from the tor network.

The same goes for root DNS server or TLD server operators. If you don't want to keep it up, take it down. It will be removed from the network.

Being a part of something doesn't mean you provide a service and if you're unable or unwilling to do so reliably then you'll be removed. If you thought this was your method of expressing your political thoughts you were wrong.

Jacob Applebaum may have done bad things, but he certainly didn't take down the tor network for a day. These self-absorbed aholes are much much worse than anything he did because they want to impact millions of people in thousands of countries so they can have their sick moment of SJW fantasy.

Sorry. If you can't run a server without wanting to keep it up, you should be removed from the network.

The Internet views censorship as damage and routes around it -- famous saying which applies ever more to this.


Slashdot Top Deals

Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. - Voltaire