It's not brain surgery.
It's not brain surgery.
And doubles the price increase from those sellers... suspiciously equal to the cost of the "free" shipping you paid for w/ Prime.
From third-party-sellers begging for reviews.
As a hypochondriac I'd be scared to take this test. Best case, I have one or all of these diseases. Worst case, I have no clue what I'm dying from.
I wondered the same thing. I understood that the battery itself wasn't the problem, but Samsung's insistence on making the device as small as possible, taking away clearance space that the battery otherwise needs to operate safely and efficiently.
You can still make up to five comedy reviews a week. Not all is lost.
What about the body's flora and immune system? Today, we have to get all sorts of shots before visiting certain foreign countries. Could it be that the future version of one's own country would be just as foreign in terms of whatever pathogens are common? Could the newly-revived body be ill-equipped to face this?
Good luck with that.
Amazon's lead is over when they've lost the market share, not when someone who wishes it were over announces it as such.
Are you really going to be THAT guy who takes a potentially ambiguous PARAPHRASING and then uses it to derail the larger point? Blizzard didn't even say this "contradiction". The article paraphrased it as such.
Blizzard said this "Defendants’ sale and distribution of the Bossland Hacks in the United States has caused Blizzard to lose millions or tens of millions of dollars in revenue, and to suffer irreparable damage to its goodwill and reputation."
It's fine to disagree with the larger point, but there's no need to start a side-show based on hearsay.
If you still need to nitpick, OK
"These bots and cheats also cause millions of dollars in lost sales, as they ruin the games for many legitimate players. "
There's no contradiction. They never said that the lost sales were from legitimate players. They just say that the game is ruined for legitimate players, and this results in lost sales.
If a brand of rice has been known to kill people because of listeria, this will result in lost sales. See? No contradiction.
Oh. That's new to me. I at least see a check box, one for MacAffee, the other for Intel True Key. But both are checked by default.
Trying to monetize the security upgrade process just reveals that you have an incentive to ship an insecure product.
For undermining security to try and trick users into installing McAffe when upgrading. That should be opt IN not opt OUT.
What am I missing here? If the customer gets the same service, whether or not they agree to the new terms, how can the new terms justify a contract? Is it true that there has to be something in it for both parties for a contract to be legal?
What trend are you talking about? How do cookies see each other? Cookies for a given domain are meant to be given to the server by the browser along with an http request. That domain is allowed to set cookies upon an http response. This is how it works now and has worked for quite some time.
Wasn't there something about a PASCAL programmer knowing the value of everything and the Wirth of nothing?