Become a fan of Slashdot on Facebook


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

How to enrage a hack in zero easy steps

Comments Filter:
  • "Benghazi"
    • No, that was enrage, not excite. Getting a hack to jerk of relentlessly in excitement is not much of an achievement.
      • Well... It's shorter than "Whitewater".

      • by pudge ( 3605 ) * Works for Slashdot

        Shrug. You're an expert on that. You clearly don't believe most of what you write -- like in our Benghazi discussion, where you literally had no arguments against what I wrote in the end, but still claimed some sort of victory -- and are only engaging to excite yourself. And you're not even fooling anyone ... which means you're a cheap date, even for yourself.

        • Are you capable of resisting the opportunity to come and present your opinion as god's own truth? Just because you can post in my JE discussions doesn't mean it is the best idea. You can sling all the insults you want, and make all the desperate attempts to twist reality that you want, but that doesn't change the facts of the matter - or the fact that you are sorely lacking in facts.
          • by pudge ( 3605 ) * Works for Slashdot

            Are you capable of resisting the opportunity to come and present your opinion as god's own truth?

            Keep up the charade if you like. Anyone can read the discussion, and if they did, would be well aware that you had no answer to my points about Benghazi. I mean, you tried, of course, but in doing so you only exposed your ignorance further, like when you said there was a three hour pause in the attacks between the consulate and the annex. I mean, this was your huge point for awhile: there was no reason to expect further attacks, no reason for American troops to go to the annex, because the annex hadn't b

            • Pudge, if you feel that you have to push your version reality at every chance you find, I won't stop you. But quite simply the opposite of most of what you just claimed is the reality and anyone could see it. Only someone desperate to make bullshit into truth would be compelled to follow me around to keep shouting said bullshit and slinging insults at me. Your anger and hatred do not make your nonsense into fact.

              Go ahead, write another reply where you accuse me of lying (which will, as per your usual,
              • by pudge ( 3605 ) * Works for Slashdot

                I've asked you before why you persist with such obvious lies, but I think I get it now. You're pretending to be President Obama. Like when yesterday, Obama said that he'd said all along that he had put a disclaimer about insurance companies possibly canceling your insurance on his oft-repeated promise that "If you like your insurance, you can keep it. Period." I mean, it's an obvious lie. He didn't do that. He many many times said "period," with no "unless." But he makes this lie anyway, as though an

When it is incorrect, it is, at least *authoritatively* incorrect. -- Hitchiker's Guide To The Galaxy