burtosis writes: From a Yale led study published in nature, researchers believe vast amounts of CO2 unaccounted for in current models will be released into the atmosphere. Yale news reports:
For decades scientists have speculated that rising global temperatures might alter the ability of soils to store carbon, potentially releasing huge amounts of carbon into the atmosphere and triggering runaway climate change. Yet thousands of studies worldwide have produced mixed signals on whether this storage capacity will actually decrease — or even increase — as the planet warms.
burtosis writes: Despite similar views about the overall place of science in America, the general public and scientists often see science-related issues
through a different lens, according to a new pair of surveys by the Pew Research Center in collaboration with the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).
burtosis writes: Challenging conventional wisdom, new research finds that the number of sunspots provides an incomplete measure of changes in the Sun's impact on Earth over the course of the 11-year solar cycle. The study, led by scientists at the High Altitude Observatory of the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) and the University of Michigan, finds that Earth was bombarded last year with high levels of solar energy at a time when the Sun was in an unusually quiet phase and sunspots had virtually disappeared. New analysis of climate change models suggests that while there is a strong scientific consensus that there is a man made environmental problem, are we spending enough money on research in order to justify efficiently funding efforts to ameliorate the problem? How do we deal with a serious problem over decades to centuries when our scientific consensus changes on a decades to yearly timeframe and how does that influence public support necessary for change?