Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. ×

Comment Re:Hard to read (Score 1) 408

Why is it patently impossible for anyone saying something positive about Trump (or even trying to turn the negative narrative around) to make a statement without falling on cognitive dissonance, denial, or just plain old-fashioned bullshit? This isn't even a Bush/Gore moment - Trump lost the majority vote and won the EC. The only debate about it is coming from him!

Comment Re:Less favorable lending rates? (Score 2) 491

"Only a Millennial ignorant of history would think that."

Ask your average GenX about why the Savings and Loan crisis kneecapped normal growth, or your average Boomer why economic policy in the 70s was so destructive to domestic production, and I'm willing to bet you will get less of a response than asking an 'Ignorant Milennial' about what happened 9 years ago,, since they just lived/ are living through it. The people who turned the wheels that caused the fuck-ups don't like talking about why it broke, and because the average citizen's memory resembles a goldfish and we like confirmation bias, we put the same idiots at the wheel over and over.

The biggest issue isn't the fantastic 'rate' itself, it's that the rate doesn't matter to an overwhelming number of people because they don't have the income required to responsibly pursue ownership. So if you have capital, the market is great (look at all these fucking flipper shows on HGTV...) but if you don't, you get squeezed under rents dictated by that market. I have friends who would be WAY better off if they could lock in cost of living with a mortgage (in many cases below 'market' rent,) but even eating ramen and killing their phone plans wouldn't make a minimum downpayment happen in a year.

Comment Re:Managers and engineers (Score 1) 185

Holyeee Shiiittt, you're goint to admit to being a trader? I feel bad for your inbox, the haterade is going to be swift and strong.

Having said that, HFT may provide you with the 'liquidity' to move trades personally, but the automation has the arbitrary consequence of grossly magnifying fuckups, and unless everyone cooperates and plays by the same rules, it creates the opportunity for Dark markets to flourish. As an Engineer, I the premise of HFT is great. But the sociologist in me is obliged to point out it creates an incredibly destructive opportunity within a Prisoner's dilemma.

Comment Re:Something's not right here (Score 1) 68

I've done telephony integration work for the better part of a decade, so I spend a LOT of time in different call centers. Avaya is losing a ton of desk-share to Cisco, mostly because the Oracle-esque hijack-you-with-licensing scheme is finally starting to cost places more than it's worth. Adding new features costs as much as just ripping the crap out and putting something else in. It was funny the first time I saw them write an RFP to a specific price point, and then lose the business anyway because they had just pissed off to many people.

Comment Re:battery life a braindead argument (Score 1) 300

First time in a while that I've seen a UID argument that low=old and outdated.
So, since we've clearly moved past ad hominem...
1. Every Goddamn Day. 'Real' photographers like 'real' cameras, even when on the move. The best camera may be the one you have on you at the time, but there's a reason people who do this for a living are still toting around dedicated, decent cameras. Hell, even the in-the-field types will apologize for shitty phone uploads. And no, not every computer needs to accommodate the workflow - but if Apple has decided that Photogs belong in the pile with the other professionals they've abandoned in the last half decade, they only group remaining to justify their shitty hardware is 'brand-obsessed hipsters.'
2. WiFi for heavy photography is shit to use. It's shit to set up, it's slow when you move any kind of RAW data, and god forbid you are working in a radio-noisy space. Look, I get it, your wifey likes to use her crappy point and shoot and pretend she's a real artist. Ask the people who are moving Gigs of data every few minutes how well it holds up. It's a toy feature - you don't even need to be a artist to know that. Ask a Engineer how well WiFi storage holds up under any kind of load.
3. Yes, the garbage-class P&S have tiny sensors. They are comparable to decent smartphones. They really don't have merits outside of learning basic photography, as you can get substantially better image quality with a marginal increase in price. What relevance does that have for this discussion?
4. I love it when Apple apologists talk about getting rid of neigh-obsolete-in-the-consumer-space technology (Optical drives, old video interfaces) as a justification for taking out shit people use every. single. day. Yeah, killing the floppy and getting rid of a 100-year old standard analog audio interface are totally the same thing.
5. The issue isn't which is more 'popular' - it's which is more *used.* Millions of MicroSD cards will sit in those phones and never be touched or thought of - they might as well be soldered into the board. While I suspect that most camera cards will actually be used as removable media, and will require an interface to get the data out of them.
Again, I don't think that Apple actually needs to support powerusers. It's way more profitable to sell incrimental, locked-in hardware to gullible idiots who garner fleeting moments of happiness by being 'superior' to people that don't use a shitty fruit computer. Apple legitimately swayed me for a few years, and I respected them as a technology company, but damn near every decision they've made recently is laser targeted at profit over quality. They just don't offer a compelling product anymore to many of the people I know personally that have defended them for decades.

Comment Re:20 devices isn't enough (Score 1) 119

- That's a lot of ... totally useful devices. Yeah, sure. Totally... You're the WiFi version of the guy I used to know with like 15k worth of X10 gear wired all over his house. Of course, he spent enough time fiddling with his crap that his wife regularly cheated on him, but to each his own... Electrical monitor? Dishwasher?!?!
- But seriously, you bring up a quasi valid point. There is a pretty severe deficiency between people who are going nuts over smart-home crap and the stock 'prosumer' grade all-in-one networking gear you can get. I'm not sure if there is a device limit using custom firmware on the Nighthawk, as I don't have more than 30 connections at a time to mine, but I've heard your complaint from other people using the factory stuff, and it's not going to be acceptable for long to say you have to use something custom.
- I don't think that sticking WiFi on every lightbulb is going to be a reliable option for very long, regardless. It's a really kludgey fix for now, but there are half a dozen other options that make sense for 'smart' devices that don't actually need a god-damned IP address and that are going to generate less noise and eat less power. Honestly, if I was younger, I would be amused fucking with people's 'smart' lightbulbs and appliances just to irritate people like you - but you either use something open, fat, and lazy like WiFi/IP, or you have a proprietary PLC-SCADA, and I'm honestly not sure which is the better solution.

Comment Re:While I don't totally disagree (Score 4, Interesting) 293

Many moons ago, OS X was extremely attractive to people who needed a computer to do work, but who didn't want to take the time to learn Windows and deal with bugs. The G4/G5 era was great for Creatives, and that naturally meant that the people who made all the dongles and the software treated OSX as their primary platforn. I supported IT at a music studio and an architecture firm, and the apple logo was EVERYWHERE. The problem wasn't that XP or 7 was 'bad', it was that the tools that people used were developed for Mac. We had desks that had 2 computers at them - a Mac for whatever the job function was, and a Dell laptop for everything else (Outlook being the primary culprit.) The problem is that Macs have been overwhelmingly shitty computers for years now, but because of the inbreeding, it takes major product shifts to drive brand-loyal users away; so here we are - lowest-common denominator consumer machines with a price premium for the brand, and professionals ripped away because they physically cannot do work anymore.

Comment Re:what's so "unthinkable"? (Score 1) 257

'Part of the problem' - why is it that you RMS apostles refuse to acknowledge that somewhere in the middle of the perfect computing utopia you think should exist there are large, multi-national corporations who's primary focus is profit, not OSS Doctrine? I hate to tell you that Santa Claus isn't real, but companies like IBM, Microsoft, Oracle, Apple, and even RedHat exist to produce a thing that other people want to buy. And Insert_Business_Here doesn't typically give a shit whether the company behind a product is "Evil" or "Good" in the eyes of a bunch of Nerds. You all like to pretend like you are somehow Righteous because it makes you feel special, but it's no different than the argument in the ME about who's fairy tale is less bullshit. Hooray, OSS keeps the industry more honest than it would otherwise be. But pretending like the prophet Linus will one day triumph over the evil Gates and Co is childish, and the rest of us have fucking work to do so we can pay our rent and spend time with our families. Jeebus.

Comment Re:Maybe it's people fleeing Oracle? (Score 1) 257

'Trust' - who gives a fuck? My job pays me to know this environment at a high technical level, to deliver solutions based on it, and to recommend realistic alternatives when new projects are scoped (of which there are, in my world, none.) That they are even superficially moving towards more 'friendly' interaction with their userbase is a great sign, and most of the enterprise folks genuinely feel it's a lot better than just that. The overwhelming majority of us move in circles where 'just use Linux' makes about as much practical sense as 'just learn to breathe underwater.' The Anti-M$ crap is petty, decades-old sour grapes that comes from the underlying hipsterism of computing, and has about as much relevance as the people who rave about how Betamax was better.

Comment Re:Netgear *firmware* (Score 1) 147

+1. The R7k is BRILLIANT running a custom DD-WRT build, and I am using largely the same running config that I've been using for the last half decade across 3 different devices. And my brother has the previous device, and while he probably couldn't handle a bricked device like I could, he is more than capable of following updates for the build I found for him.

Comment Re:If true, it's because Macs are starting to suck (Score 1) 376

"no value for geeks" - Odd, we use them now as quick and simple interfaces for various Dashboards, because it makes more sense to hand out half a dozen than to have a big stupid screen on the wall. iPads were great, but you can flip from static display to full domain-auth'd windows machine in seconds.

Comment Re:Glitchless streaming. (Score 1) 158

Obligatory 'I-wish-I-had-Mod-Points' reply for taking the piss out of a terrible, quasi-technical justification for shitty carrier practices. Fix your damn network, spend on future growth, and stop banking your business model on the Govt. suddenly making your protected business even more protected...

Comment Re:Welcome to 1999 (Score 1) 140

Only in that the default audio playback application bundled with the OS could not legally handle MP3's, forcing you to use a 3rd party application, which was the default behavior for most Windows users through at least XP. I'd imagine it had about as much relevance as being unable to burn a CD back in the day without software like Roxio (or whatever the OSS comparable app was, I was still in grade school.) The big drawback to Linux for decades was simply that it didn't ship with the computer you bought from Dell (or Best Buy, or Circuit City, or whatever...) and that it required a non-trivial effort to get to the level of functionality that most people expected from a PC post- Windows 95. Of course, there is the continuous struggle of an OS that is designed from the ground up to avoid as many licensing and royalty restrictions as possible, since for much of the PC's history, code was written for profit and not just to be sweet. Furthermore, am I really replying to a 4-digit UID with this crap? I thought all of you graybeards actually knew how this crap worked...

Slashdot Top Deals

You have mail.