Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×
Spam

Submission + - Building a Web 2.0 site to promote good comments?

MessyBlob writes: When a website invites comments, with any luck there will be more than a dozen responses, which is when the fun starts: you'll need to show the good ones to add value to the site, but at first you won't know which are good. Here's the problem: How can we get the good comments (among many) to bubble to the top: first you need to make them visible, have them rated, and then ensure that any potentially good new comments can be seen in order to be rated as good.

Most mainstream sites fail to do this, so what's the best way of giving all good comments a chance to add value to a site? Is it simply to have, say, 25% of the comments taken randomly from the lesser-rated list, presented among the highly-rated comments? Does time-ordering do the same? Is there a critical ratio of users vs commenters?
Software

Submission + - Opportunist websites charging for my Freeware! (johnvalentine.co.uk) 4

MessyBlob writes: "I'm the author of a Freeware game (Zenith), which I provide for free on my website and two other mirrors. I now find that an unassociated opportunist website (10001 downloads) is charging for the download (the user asks for a download-unlocking password via text message at £1.50 UKP). I feel it is unfair for third parties to profit from my intellectual property and development efforts, and I have not issued a licence for the website to charge for delivering my software. How can I prevent this happening to my software, and others?"

Slashdot Top Deals

"Oh my! An `inflammatory attitude' in alt.flame? Never heard of such a thing..." -- Allen Gwinn, allen@sulaco.Sigma.COM

Working...