Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:Questionable value (Score -1, Flamebait) 294

"In general, the tone of the article seems to be that many people should not be allowed on the web because they can't follow standards"

And that would include, I think, the article's authors. Using DOCTYPE HTML is a non-standard DTD, they haven't specified any character encoding, and whilst they've cottoned on to the HTML entity for an opening right-angle bracket they haven't yet to the HTML entity for a closing bracket. This last isn't invalid I don't think, just stupid.

Also, check out the source for google.com for some awful, non-standards HTML:

http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http:/ /www.google.co.uk/

This is the sort of markup muck that they generally spit out. So with respect to "I wonder how much HTML coding the authors do" I'd say slightly more than the google web devs.

Slashdot Top Deals

Real Programmers don't write in PL/I. PL/I is for programmers who can't decide whether to write in COBOL or FORTRAN.

Working...