ChunKing writes: How much in grammes is the mass of information on the Internet? About 0.2 millionths of an ounce — about the mass of a very small grain of sand — and another 40 grammes of mass energy to drive that data around according to this guy.
tkel writes: On October 12, 2011 Theologian John Haught publicly debated prominent evolutionary scientist and atheist Jerry Coyne at the University of Kentucky. Although both agreed to a videotaping of the event, Haught later prohibited it's release because he felt he had been treated unfairly. Coyne released blog posts addressing the matter as an offense to free speech. Reviewing their new status in the blogosphere, Haught and his associates at the University of Kentucky have decided to release the video.
itwbennett writes: "Researchers from the University of British Columbia (UBC) created a network of 102 bots designed to mimic humans on social networks, and released them on Facebook with the intent of befriending as many users as possible and collecting private information. After an 8-week test, the researchers found that they were able to defeat Facebook's fake account detection mechanisms 80% of the time. Not too surprisingly, bots using female profiles had a better chance of having their friend requests accepted."
snydeq writes: "Advice Line's Bob Lewis discusses the difficulties IT faces in embracing the kinds of consumer technologies business users are demanding they support. 'Let's assume the consumerization of IT is the big trend many think it is. But using consumer tech in a business environment is a very different matter from being satisfied with consumer tech in a business environment. One of IT's legitimate gripes is that we're often asked to turn consumer-grade technology into business-grade technology with a wave of our magic wands. On top of the intrinsic technical challenges, there's this: IT doesn't have anything that even resembles a methodology for performing the business analysis we need to figure out what it means to put consumer tech to productive day-to-day use.'"
PPL and PRS are way behind what the technology can now deliver, and another huge area of weakness in their approach is around licensing internet radio. These two bodies are way too greedy and are all too quick to try to extract their 'pound of flesh' from smaller broadcasters so it's fantastic news to see that a giant such as Google has had enough of them and has chosen to deprive them of significant revenues. Go Google!
ChunKing writes: A classic case of foot-in-mouth syndrome this week from the possibly highly-educated and not-very-usefully-employed Director of Future Media and Technology at the BBC, Ashley Highfield who has claimed that among BBC's 17 million-odd users 5% of them use Macs but only about 400-600 users run Linux. The implication being that as so few users use Linux then they realistically be ignored with regard to the iPlayer and online media provision.
A Facebook group has already been started in an attempt to make Mr Highfield "eat his words" and in the great British tradition a petition is also under way. This blog site refers to figures from 2005 that would put Mr Highfield's wild and unsubstantiated claims out by at least a factor of ten.
Notwithstanding the fact that thousands of Linux users are also BBC licence payers, I wonder what response Slashdotters have to say to the BBC's Mr Highfield?