Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop


Forgot your password?
Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! No Flash necessary and runs on all devices. ×
User Journal

Journal Chacham's Journal: Rant/Suggestion: Study/Report Moderation History 2

I don't think anyone will argue that Slashdot moderation is good. Better than nothing? Yeah, sure. I use the higher numbers to filter out the the best comments. That works somewhat, but not well.

I guess the purpose of moderation is in question. My childish gut reaction is a reward system. Good post, here's a karma point, or "kudos". Bad post, shame on you, here's a slap. I think that would explain the general tendencies. However, when I actually *read* article comments, I use the moderation totals to weed out the best comments, unless I want to read what everyone has to say. IIRC, that was Taco's original intention.

The most disturbing thing for me is the ratio of comments in each number. +2 are for people with a quickie mod. Mods happen a lot, and many comments will be modded. Does half sound good? +3 is already pushing it, this is a double mod. In other words, a serious comment. Whatever the ratio of +2 to +1, +3 should be even less in relation to +2. +4 should be the same, and +5, the ultimate mod, should have next to nothing in it.

For a quick example, I'll check the hof for the most popular story, comment-wise. Currently. that is What's Keeping You On Windows? with a total of 3212 comments.

Here's the breakdown excluding -1.

# AMT Twd Lwd Per Lwdp
0: 3161 0000 0000 00.0 00.0
1: 2268 0893 0893 71.7 28.7
2: 0919 2242 1349 29.0 43.4
3: 0144 3017 0775 04.5 24.9
4: 0074 3087 0070 02.3 02.2
5: 0059 3102 0015 01.8 00.4

# - Moderation number.
AMT - Amount of comments.
Twd - Total amount of comments weeded out. (Amt - 3161)
Lwd - Amount of comments weeded out this level. (Last level's AMT - AMT)
Per - Percentage of total comments. (AMT / 3161)
Lwdp - Percentage this level weeded of total. (Lwd / 3102)

+2 cuts out most of the comments. +3 is good too, it further cuts the comments in half. +4 already, however, is dissapointing. It only weeds around two percent of the total comments or only half of the last level's. And +5 is a joke, weeding less than half a percent,a dn staying nearly the same as the last level.

I think a study should be done on many stories. To see the general tendencies, and when moderation works. In popular stories, past +3 it really doesn't, though there must be a way.

This discussion was created by Chacham (981) for no Foes, but now has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Rant/Suggestion: Study/Report Moderation History

Comments Filter:
  • Also, you have to take into account extra modifiers that you put on yourself. I give Insightful, Informative, Interesting, and funny an extra point, because I've noticed that the +4 is about the same as +5 (as you noted) and that then gives a chance for the +3 to be seen by me (I weed out +3 and lower) This way I get to see everything that is insightful, informative, interesting, and funny, but keeping it at about 50 comments. It works well. On top of that, I give a +5 to friends because I already know that I either think the same or am stimulated by what they have to say.
    • The extra modifiers do not effect the numbers in the drop down box. For example, you are showing up here as +5, yet the list shows you in the count of +1.

      I notice the +5/+4 similarities a lot. I just chose one discussion to study. If there's any interest, maybe I'll do others. This is a bad trend, but it looks like most people don't care.

fortune: cpu time/usefulness ratio too high -- core dumped.