Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 Internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:32% would vote clinton (Score 2, Informative) 993

You should see this: If you don't trust salon, take your pick of the many other sites that have covered this. Those articles all make the assessment that Hillary's email 'furor' was not a legal matter. Yet the haters and the political organizations keep the ball in the air, hoping for a miracle before November. I don't know if you are among them, but from your rhetoric, it seems likely. Not going to touch the rest of your pro-conspiracy rant here. Just wanted to shed a little light.

Comment physical switches are not protection (Score 2) 202

First it was having an 'indicator light' when the camera was in operation, and we were assured it was absolutey secure - until this came to light. (<URL:>) I read about someone who overcame a physical switch but have lost the link.

Nonetheless, I would not assume any physical switch on a computer. It's read and execution based on the sensor is still software (or firmware, or microcode).

It's not just the camera you need to protect. I used to carry a small audio adapter - plug it into the laptop and the built-in microphone is disabled. I got out of the habit, but the tape is always there.

Comment chrome stable (48.0) links to (Score 1) 95

I can find no workarounds for Chrome - posted in the chrome forum. Just wondered if anyone else was concerned enough to figure out how to disable it in Chrome until the library is updated.
From ldd output of /opt/google/chrome/chrome: => /usr/lib64/ (0x00007fb69a34e000)

Comment Re:LOL! (Score 1) 116

O/T: There was no Fed before 1913. However, we've had one form or another of a national bank for much longer; the story of how Andrew Jackson stared down Nicholas Biddle and put a leash on the Second Bank of the United States is quite a different story. Perhaps it was this which you attempted to reference...but even then, the BUS lost.

Submission + - Firefox rapid-release schedule impacts enterprises (

Bill Privatus writes: The headline shouts: "Enterprise IT unhappy with Firefox 4's quick demise — Firefox 4's retirement 'kick in the stomach,' says IBM manager".

For enterprises like IBM where a plethora of operating systems are in use, where can they turn? Is there any hope of a serious backlash, given that Mozilla not only shows casual disregard but flaunts the fact that they would do nothing in service of business? Microsoft has graciously pointed out that their browser ( would gladly serve — but that's little consolation to those of us running Linux or Mac.


Submission + - Mozilla Executive Snubs Enterprise Level Users

adeelarshad82 writes: In reponse to Firefox specialist and consultant Mike Kaply's blogpost, Mozilla Executive ended up saying something ironic and disturbing. Mike Kaply's blogpost was justifiably lamenting Firefox's rapid release scheduling and its negative impact on businesses. Firefox 4 was only released in March. Now, three months later Firefox 5.0 is out in stable release. Hence, Mozilla has ceased supporting Firefox 4. The response, which the executive clearly didn't think through because Mozilla earns most of its revenue through businesses (hence the irony), basically implied that Mozilla couldn't care less about businesses. It was disturbing because Dotzler's comment is also counter to what Mozilla and others in the open source community have been telling businesses for years: give open source a try.

Submission + - Police share Intelligence on innocent people (

doperative writes: Logica have worked alongside The National Policing Improvement Agency (NPIA) to develop a new database which allows Police departments across England and Wales to share intelligence relating to crime ..

Advocates of the new database retort by arguing that it is the nature of police work which makes it essential to hold the records of innocent people ..

In total around 12,000 authorised officers will have access with secure access controls acting to ensure that only role relevant information can be searched.

Comment Re:Singapore (Score 1) 66

dAzED1, You're quite right in your facts. This is not something that your average techno-geek (or slashdot nerd) is going to grok or espouse, as you're seeing here. It something that will save enterprises (the larger the better) huge piles of money, while providing all the benefits you cite (and a few you have missed).

I'm riding this wave, too, but from the other side of the table. And Cloud - as an enabler - is bringing fantastic (in a business sense) and fascinating (in a technical sense) technologies to the realm of possibility.

The reason I'm replying, though, is to cast a bit of a cautionary note: not everything is cloud-ready or even cloud-friendly. Regulatory issues like BASEL II will make some information/applications impossible for public cloud. SPI (sensitive personal information) and 'classified' or 'confidential' information may never be put into a public cloud. And that's as it should be.

However, having said that, there are private cloud solutions and hybrid solutions that can be brought to bear.

"Cloud" is the foundation technology, the infrastructure enabler, as I see it, that will allow and even encourage this 'entirely new paradigm' to grow and flourish into an entirely new generation of technologies.

And the rate of adoption is just terrific; the interest is, as someone described it to me recently, so exciting it's scary. It will be some time before the field settles, but my money's on the global players who can bring virtually limitless resources to the problem.

Submission + - Boucher-Stearns - new consumer privacy bill (

Bill Privatus writes: This is two days old now, but .... I just heard about it. I didn't find it on the site, either.

Happy news appeared on the Dataloss Mailing List ( on May 4, on legislation that actually /advances/ the cause of Internet Privacy. Three cheers for Rick Boucher (D-VA) and Cliff Stearns (R-FL) for this one. Let's hope we see more work like this done in our country's legislative center...

From the ars technica story: 'Under the bill, companies would be forbidden from using your cell phone's geolocation information without your consent, and the same goes for information on your race, religious beliefs, or sexual orientation. For most other information, a simple opt-out will keep that data—even data already collected—from being used...As for Boucher, he sees the bill as ultimately pro-business. "Our goal is to encourage greater levels of electronic commerce by providing to Internet users the assurance that their experience online will be more secure," he said in a statement. "That greater sense of privacy protection will be particularly important in encouraging the trend toward cloud computing.'

Slashdot Top Deals

The decision doesn't have to be logical; it was unanimous.