Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?
DEAL: For $25 - Add A Second Phone Number To Your Smartphone for life! Use promo code SLASHDOT25. Also, Slashdot's Facebook page has a chat bot now. Message it for stories and more. Check out the new SourceForge HTML5 internet speed test! ×

Comment Re:It's not surprising... (Score 1) 176

"1-off communications with vendors, institutions, legal documents."

Such are hardly ever "one- off", but part of a long relationship.
They would have worked out a common format long ago.

Anyway, don't see why it should be the recipients' responsibility to work out whatever crap some random person wanted to send.

PDF is pretty universal.
Hell, plain text would do for 99% of documents.

Anyway, the side with the power is who determines the format.
If I submit a file to a publisher, they have a page of specs I have to follow exactly if I want them to read it.

In any relationship with government, it has the power, and you comply with their format or .... there is no "or". You just have to do it their way.


Comment Re:It's not surprising... (Score 1) 176

Have you ever submitted a document to the government? If it doesn't fit their spec, they just reject it. Costs them no time, less work for them.

What is the alternative anyway? Accept every document from any source and spend hours trying to decode it?

I actually do shit like that because I'm dealing with files sent to me by clients, because they pay me.

Funnily enough I use WordPerfect 5 as my usual intermediate format to go from whatever the client uses to what my old DTP apps need.

Wordprocessors reached a stage of virtual perfection 20 years ago, and since then all they've done is add bloat, having so many features, ribbons, and WTF on their screen that 99% of users have no clue how to use them.

Last book length doc I got in Word had all its chapter heads pushed to the top of page by a series of blank lines, for instance.
30 years ago you could set a heading to start a new page. I could teach people how to do that in WordStar and the other basics in 10 minutes. Now, it's considered esoteric.


Comment Re:What He's Saying is... (Score 1) 499

"Fact-checking" is just weasel words for "control the narrative."

No, it's comparing politicians' statements with facts that van be verified by anyone.

It's terrifying that so many voters seem to agree with you that facts don't matter.

Even more so that people on a technology site like this would dismiss any fact based argument they dislike out of hand.

Comment Re:And? (Score 1) 140

"My point is that there is no World Government so there is no way to enforce World rules"

Maybe someone could invent a "treaty", or an "agreement" between countries, and create some form of "united nations" to administer it?

No, that's just crazy and impossible. The only solution is total war until The Donald rules all.

Comment Re:Such folly... (Score 1) 795

We don't have to be "the warmest the planet has ever been" to avert an ice age. Current temp or higher is good enough for that, and there is no prospect of it being lower short of humanity wiping itself out.

Our inputs are swamping the natural cycles unintentionally. If in a far future, post carbon era, temps started to go down, we could easily pump greenhouse gases into the air to prevent it going lower. But no matter what energy we use, we're going to be producing more raw heat every year anyway. Short of a nuclear winter, there will never be another ice age.

Comment Re:Also (Score 2) 795

"the next ice age is an inevitability"

No, it's been cancelled, at least as long as human civilisation is around.

If we actually needed more global warming, therw are plenty of ways -- pumping out methane, for instance.
Look at the ways proposed to terraform Mars. They'd all be much easier to do here.

Of course, if we nuke ourselves back to the stone age, yes, the natural climate cycles will eventually reassert themselves.

Comment Re:This just in! (Score 1) 85


Welcome to 1800. As soon as people made machines out of metal, humidity was fucking them up.

I live in Hong Kong where for half the year we have humidity over 90% every day.

Everything either rusts, corrodes or goes mouldy. Bicycles turn to piles of rust in a few months. Fungus grows in your crotch. The many and various colours of corroded metals on electronics are marvellous to behold.

Comment Re:Not this old info again (Score 0) 521

"No one is talking about making cars illegal because terrorists use cars. Why is that?"

For the same reason that no one dares talk about making guns illegal whenever some nutjob massacres a class of schoolkids with an assault rifle.

People want to have guns and cars and don't care how many thousands are going to die year after year as a cost.

Comment Re:Not this old info again (Score 1) 521

"They keep trying, however the true fact remains no encryption was used by these terrorists."

I don't know if this is true. But it doesn't matter. You can't uninvent encryption. If every American company is forced to backdoor their software, it won't stop terrorists using perfectly secure encryption.

Maybe the idea is that all "innocent" people will use the broken encryption, leaving anyone using the real thing as a target. But there are enough people, and especially companies, that will insist on using secure encryption to make this unworkable in a short time.

Slashdot Top Deals

Backed up the system lately?