You have to have someone else stand over your shoulder and say "enhance image" otherwise it won't work.

You can't use this technique to convert and already filmed 2D to fake 3D. This technique works by filming those "occluded areas" already, much like a 3d camera would.

Yeah, I don't understand how this is going to prevent anything. Or do people ONLY accept autocomplete results? When 'prescription drugs online' doesn't give you the option you want, then keep typing 'without a prescription' then hit return. OBVIOUSLY enough people already did that for it to be a top autocomplete suggestion.

My company has used SVN for the last 5 years, and I've used it personally a tad longer, on windows. Never had a DB corruption, nor heard of anyone having one. While I don't NEED to use multiple tools, I do sometimes, mainly for ease of use. Sometimes the GUI is better, sometimes just using the CLI is better.

Your example are great, but you can't change the aim of the camera in shot. Which I believe is part of the point of this DIY

And yet people do EXACTLY that all the time (even your example of building (or restoring) a car...

Of course things changed. Back then the conspiracy theories were just theories... now they are fact.

Just look at the number of people here who claim "the tsa is ok, as long as one person is saved" or "its ok for them to listen to our phonecalls, if it saves just one life." That is fear talking.

Less is generally better. Fewer lines (I should say fewer statements) are generally easier to read, and typically have fewer errors. Of course that doesn't mean you have to cram everything into one line.

I don't know what you think an IDE does, but any good IDE pretty much ONLY allows you to work on the "raw" .c or .cpp files. IDEs will usually have dialog editors that allow you to visually edit the resource files. But this is about the only "abstracting" away an IDE will do for you. Of course the advantage of using an IDE, the IDE will allow you to jump around and access definitions and declarations much easier.

ok, so they collected data from corporations, by "court order" without a reasonable suspicion. (And no, "something might possibly happen" isn't a reason). Then when a foreign suspect pops up (notice how they use the word "terrorist" but here a person is innocent until proven guilty, so they are at best a suspect) They then search ALL the data they illegally collected. This also sounds like an unreasonable search. Then and only then did they then "follow proper procedures" and laws. And that somehow makes it ok?
It is still unconstitutional. We have the right to be secure in our persons and our belongings. This meant we were secure.
All thanks to the boogey man.

So, what you are saying is, all of the people who HAVE given their lives for the freedom of our country, wasted their life? They shouldn't have bothered. They should have saved themselves, stayed alive. Because it is more important to be alive, than to be free?

If you make it difficult to use patents and copyrights as "offensive" weapons, then how do you protect your patent or copyright? And how are the more corporation focused than inventor/artist focused?

He didn't say you had to pay the interns. You only have to pay them if you make them do essentially grunt work. You hire interns to train them. They may still do some lower end jobs, for free, as long as they are learning.

No, no we don't. Just because you do, doesn't mean everyone else does as well.