Comment Re:Actually makes good sense (Score 1) 702
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
Right, and now define probable cause. That happens outside of the constitution — in court. It's interpreted every time.
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause,
Right, and now define probable cause. That happens outside of the constitution — in court. It's interpreted every time.
Here, try this article and its comments.
If that happens to shut down almost every business in town then great.
But won't you think of the economy? We must enable mankind to engage in economic activity, no matter the cost!
No beam. Less space than a Nomad. Lame.
Samsung and most of the cellphone vendors have the design expertise to put an openable battery compartment in their case designs. The folks at Apple, not so much.
I have an LG E960 (aka "Nexus 4") you insensitive etc.
I live in California. I have to pay when I buy electronics, but not when I dispose of them. Not more than a month ago I junked a stack of old electronics, from some of which I had cannibalized the good bits, and not even bothered with reassembly. Just toss 'em in the marked dumpster. And of course, the old cellphones can be disposed of at your local post office. California will also take my batteries for free, so I save 'em up in mayo jars.
Obviously, someone pays for this stuff, and that someone is partially me. But since I don't have to pay a fee to dispose of it, there's no incentive not to dispose of it properly.
If you can't power the things up there is no way to tell what they actually are.
If the TSA worked for us, they'd have a power supply at the checkpoint so you can prove that your device works even if the battery is dead.
I think that, if you wanted to include democrats in a similar light you'd have to ask them about nuclear power. They tend to completely disregard science when it comes to technologies they fear.
I'm not a democrat, but as an anti-USA-nuclear liberal I also don't disregard science. Instead, I believe that the pro-nuclear lobby is blatantly ignoring human nature. Maybe it's just American nature, I don't know. I simply don't trust my country to safely operate, maintain, and deal with the waste from nuclear reactors. That doesn't mean I think nobody should do nuclear. It means I'm opposed to it here.
There are at least three separate arguments here. One is whether it's wrong to spy on anyone. The next is whether it's wrong to spy on your own citizens. The third is whether you ever have an excuse to violate the highest law of the land (the constitution, of course) in order to uphold lesser laws.
It's not hypocritical to believe that the answers are no, yes, and no, respectively. It's douchey, but not hypocritical. Hypocritical would be ignoring the fact that every nation with the funding has an espionage program.
I'm absolutely sure that you can reduce emissions that way. But at what cost?
What's the cost of not reducing emissions?
Developing countries are going to have to not only choose renewables, but also encourage the rest of us to use them, or we will all suffer. It doesn't matter what the cost is, does it? The cost of not doing it is far higher.
Fucking hell drinkpoo, get a grip. People who drive for a living generally are better at it,
That might have been true, once. But record numbers of truckers have very little experience. Even if they want to be better at it, they don't yet know how. And frankly, I have seen too much bullshit driving from clearly inattentive truckers to believe your unsupported nonsense.
and driving a truck is harder than driving a car.
So what? Lots of things are harder than other things, that's not an excuse for doing them wrong — especially when the lives of others depend on you doing them right.
The only problems truck drivers have on the road are vehicles other than trucks (99.9% of the time).
Snicker snort. The biggest problem truck drivers have on the road, besides the ones that are just a danger to themselves and others all the time, is lack of sleep. This problem will be entirely eliminated by eliminating the truckers. Truckers get into single-vehicle accidents due to lack of sleep all the damned time.
It must have been that comment moaning about government interference that had me fooled.
Moaning? You wouldn't know moaning if it were up your ass kicking field goals. I was complaining about the specific nature of this government activity, not issuing a sermon against the concept of government. You should see a doctor about that knee. I think they can offer you some sort of treatment to help you stop jerking it.
There's no shortage of those yet but they're really nice controllers as-is, they have a zillion purposes without being cannibalized. And these days you can buy controller parts for a song, so it would be nice to see the design adapted to use some readily available controller replacement parts instead. It would cost only a few bucks more, even assuming a free SNES controller.
The number of jobs is dependent on the number of people willing to take the initiative, find a niche they can fill and start businesses to fill the niche and create jobs.
Less the number of people who are discouraged from creating a job by regulations bought and paid for by big business and/or unions specifically to stifle competition.
I see why you didn't log in.
Why does the government get the blame for not preventing the processed food industry,
Reading comprehension, you fail it. The government gets the blame for being the processed food industry's whore, and every other industry's as well — but that is outside the scope of this conversation.
You can't both believe in a hands off government,
I don't.
Never test for an error condition you don't know how to handle. -- Steinbach