Comment Re: To be honest (Score 1) 356
People will absolutely find out if their prints are indeed uploaded or stored on their device.
Why would they need your fingerprint?
Fingerprints are for physical access. Apple has remote access.
People will absolutely find out if their prints are indeed uploaded or stored on their device.
Why would they need your fingerprint?
Fingerprints are for physical access. Apple has remote access.
Whoosh!
OK, but will you be able to call and say why you're going to be late for the meeting?
This has the added benefit that if you cut your hand, burn your finger, etc. then you'll be locked out and won't be able to dial 911.
Try wiping your hands between eating a donut and using your phone.
His glands make him eat donuts?
if you have some super secret corporate info on your iphone you should be relying on a lot more than a consumer level fingerprint scanner for security
Especially when it's on a glass device that's covered with your fingerprints....
They lied about posting stuff which didn't turn up; cards appeared at my door saying `you were out` when I was not out etc.
FEDEX does that too.
You know their promise about how if it's one second late they refund the money? What really happens is that a message appears on their computer that "they called but you were out" then they give you the runaround on the phone until you get tired of calling them.
Also: 'Side Slip angle Control' and 'top speed' aren't related.
(Except in the USA, where there's no corners on racetracks).
No backup?
Didn't he write some source code control system or other to prevent this...?
...and how many updates can we expect to have to manually install over the next year if we administer a few dozen machines?
What will they use as fertilizer?
Either it's difficult enough that the developers didn't want to spend the time and money to make their code compatible with the most incompatible OS currently available
I don't mean stuff that isn't compatible with Windows, I mean actual Windows programs where the authors expect you to compile it yourself with a particular version of VC++, or even with command-line gcc and makefiles (VC++ is a free download, what Windows developer in their right mind uses gcc?)
Why don't they just post a binary? There's only one Windows 'distro' (yes, there's various versions but they're all compatible).
It's like they don't want people to use their software.
In most cases it's easy if you already know how and have the environment set up.
So...basically nobody. Way to alienate a lot of potential users.
The risks from green potatoes are no more significant than the risks associated with basically any meat product.
Nobody's saying they are, but they're probably far greater than the risks from Golden Rice.
So you need to rewrite the whole damn 5TB disk?
You failed to read even the summary?
No man is an island if he's on at least one mailing list.
