Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive


Forgot your password?

Comment Re:Different jobs, different needs (Score 1) 122

Sure, but there's no need for them to sit in our chairs or wear human sneakers and designer jeans.

Allowing a bit of leeway on the exact size/shape of the parts could make everything else a lot better (and cheaper).

In an environment where stairs are just the "emergency exit" (ie. most factories, hospitals, office buildings, apartments, etc.) then adding bipedal legs is pointless.

Comment Re:A new law in not what is needed (Score 0, Flamebait) 519

. . so people cant wear skirts anymore? Sharia Law is over there . . . .

What about windy days? Can we outlaw them, too.

And escalators. They often give people an eyeful of thigh (and not all of it is pretty, ew!)

Many upskirts will show less than a miniskirt or booty shorts. How will that factor in to the new law? Will the length of the skirt be taken into account?

So many questions....

Comment Re:Better be for Windows 7 (Score -1) 127

DirectX11 was back ported to Vista.

The reason DirectX 10/11 was not backported to XP was not because of mean old bad microsoft but rather WinXP is such an obsolete archaic OS that is fundamentally different.

Weird that the system requirements for DX11 suddenly changed later on - to allow XP!

Some people might think that it was mean old bad microsoft after all...that the "obsolete archaic OS" thing was just a lie.

Comment Re:Better be for Windows 7 (Score -1) 127

It was necessary evil to be able to publish new video driver model architecture with neat features, get over it.


People managed to make DX10 run on XP without official support from MS/NVIDIA/AMD:

Later on...guess what? Microsoft decided to allow DX11 to run as well:

There's no relation between an operating system and the feature set exposed by the video driver. It's just another API.

Slashdot Top Deals

Chairman of the Bored.