USA Freedom Act
No. The Constitution is exactly that, a constitution. It is a base governing document that lays out the form of government and various rights and responsibilities. It is silent on many things. It says nothing about how much money Social Security is getting next year, or the Marines, or if section 205 of the Patriot Act even exists.
We don't need another Law. The Laws that made this garbage legal are unconstitutional and criminal.
If you think they are unconstitutional, then can you show where they were struck down by a court as such? If they aren't struck down by a court, then they need to be repealed by the legislature.
We don't need another Law. We need to hunt down and incarcerate the criminals who created this mess.
You need another law to repeal or alter the aspects of the law that you don't like if a court doesn't strike it down. The criminals responsible for creating this mess have been the source of an active manhunt for 12 years. The ringleader is dead, and most of his original lieutenants are either captured or dead, some are in hiding. Since I'm sure you didn't mean that - you better wait until Congress repeals it, or it will still be on the books.
We don't need another Law. We need to hold government officials personally accountable for their flagrant and criminal violations of the Constitution.
An election is coming up. Do your worst.
We don't need another Law. We already have a USA Freedom Act. It is called "The Constitution of the United States."
We've covered this, but I'll add one more thing. The Constitution gave Congress the power to make laws. Congress made a law that resulted in this issue. Since the courts haven't struck it down, it is still the law of the land. How about we let Congress do their job and pass a law to try and resolve the issue instead of making specious claims that no law change is required?
... the corporatist warmongering pigs and the crypto-Zionists pulling their strings.
If you are the real "Ethanol-fueled," it's time for treatment.
... it seems to me the Israeli government uses Judaism as a weapon against their detractors, since nobody can say anything about Israel's bad behavior without being accused of anti-semitism.
Many people use anti-Zionism against Israel as a cloak for anti-Semitism.
ivy league universities whose cultures are loaded with marxist philosophy
I was going to parody this comrade, but I couldn't think of any way to make it funnier.
What I see isn't so much funny as sad. Higher education has clearly been captured by the Left, and Cultural Marxism is dominant. Ideas springing from or influenced by Marxism are influential or dominant in many areas even when outright Marxism isn't. Chomsky is the most highly cited living author. Apparently you would deny this.
I think a lot of people would argue that the vast majority of "defensive use of firearms in deadly situations" would not even be necessary in a country where it is even slightly difficult to get your hands on automatic firearms.
I think you are making some faulty assumptions about defensive firearms use. They are used in many differ sorts of circumstances as you can see from a few of the stories at this link: Stories That Happened In MI
No, actually it doesn't. Toss out suicides and criminal-on-criminal violence and you're still left with outrageous numbers of cases of "defensive use of firearms" (which you mentioned in the first paragraph but had forgotten in the second?).
I think you will find some interesting commentary here: Murder by Numbers
George Soros doesn't attempt to hide what he does with his money.
That is too funny! Remember this little gem? - Discredited Lancet study gets even more discredited
That must have been some of the best propaganda money Soros ever spent. That "club" he paid for kept giving, and giving, and giving.
There is far more than goes on with him and his money than meets the eye.
"Socialist" is little more than a pejorative. I truly wish we had some genuine socialists in the US, not because I support their politics
(Not that I approve of their message, but they exist.)
then search sometime for "AM talk radio"
If you like clarity, try Prager.
Assertion without evidence - dismiss without it
It's nice that you say so. The problem is: I don't believe you. I cannot. There is no oversight whatsoever concerning your actions.
In view of the first part of your statement, can you back up the claim that there is no oversight whatsoever? That seems to be an assertion without evidence.
You can't change facts with moderation.
It doesn't matter if they can or not, it is their motivation towards violence. But keep in mind the future is an uncertain thing, and there are many changes coming to the world. Europe's native population will plunge in the next 50-100 years since the birthrate is far below replacement. Many of the immigrants are from Muslim nations and are hostile to European values, and they constitute a growing segment of the population. There has been a tendency for the 2nd generation immigrants to radicalize. Many of the Muslims in Europe support Sharia law and want it locally. Many of them support violence in the name of Islam. What will come of it in 50 years?
Having lived in East Germany, I can tell you. East Germans didn't pretend they were free.
Americans don't have to pretend, they are free. Maybe not as free as they were 100 years ago, but still free.
The one day you'd sell your soul for something, souls are a glut.