Please create an account to participate in the Slashdot moderation system

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment It's the apps, stupid (Score 1) 403

If apps start requiring Directx 11.n and, as a result, I cannot run those apps on Windows 7; then that will be one more reason why Windows is no longer a solution for me.

.
First Microsoft releases an awful version of Windows (8.0), then Microsoft backtracks (temporarily?) and restores some useful functionality that was removed (emphasis on some).

The question remains, how long before Microsoft has another dose of stupid, and re-removes the Start button and boot to desktop. Strategically, it is what they want to do, so you know they will keep trying to do it.

Comment Re:The answer is... it depends (Score 1) 358

Of course by this time our interest was piqued - with just a simple google search we discovered the girls website - while the content of the site was not porn the masthead showed her posing in bondage gear, and copy relating to her various preferences! She did get an interview but the cards were already on the table.

Why did you waste her time with an interview if the cards were already on the table?

.
From what you describe, I suspect if she did get the job, it would have been a hostile work environment for her, with too many busybodies poking around into her private life.

Comment The answer is... it depends (Score 4, Informative) 358

As a hiring manager, my focus is whether or not the applicant is able to do well in the position. I've never really concerned myself with the online presence of the applicant. I look at rummaging around in google to check out an applicant as more or less equivalent to hiring an investigator to do a background check. The fact that googling is easier and cheaper than hiring an investigator does not change the motive for doing so.

.
An exception would be if the applicant links to his professional online presence in the CV. Then I would use that as I would any other information on the CV. However the presence on the web does not make the information different than having the same information on the CV.

If I were hiring for a sensitive position where a background check is warranted, then I would do a real background check.

But if no background check is required, why go poking around in someone's private life.

Comment Re:Some sites block... (Score 1) 148

unless users actually refuse to use Target's web site because they don't want to be tracked.

Target's website refuses entry for those customers who do not have tracking cookies enabled. It is Target's choice, not the customers'.

I'm sure Target has carefully evaluated the situation, and the result is the decisions they've made.

Yeah, preventing customers from walking through the main entrance and buy things is always a good thing for a store to do.

Comment Some sites block... (Score 1) 148

Some sites block you if you do not allow their cookies unfettered access. One example is target.com (the department store). You cannot get past the home page unless you open up your browser to all the cookies they want to place on your disk. It doesn't make sense for a store to prevent customers from using their website to shop.

.
Target needs to re-evaluate their purpose for having a website - do they want to use the website to place cookies on peoples' disks? Or does target want to use the website to sell merchandise?

Comment Psychosomatic (Score 1) 532

So do LEDs bother your eyes?

You need to do double-blind testing to see whether you are really bothered by the LED flicker, or you just think you are bothered by the flicker.

...has increasingly started to bug me: backlight flicker...

Perhaps it has increasingly started to bug you because you are becoming increasingly aware of it, and not vice versa.

.
It is a common marketing ploy to create a perceived problem, then magically have a product available for sale that just happens to assuage that newly perceived problem.

Comment Metric should be number of tickets, not revenue... (Score 4, Insightful) 364

...a whopping $125.1 million....

With the ever-increasing price of tickets, using revenue as a judge of "record-breaking" is grossly inaccurate, as it erroneously compares unequal ticket prices and ignores the effect of inflation over the years.

.
It would be more accurate (though still not completely accurate) to use the number of tickets sold as the basis for judging whether all-time records have been broken.

Slashdot Top Deals

If you hype something and it succeeds, you're a genius -- it wasn't a hype. If you hype it and it fails, then it was just a hype. -- Neil Bogart

Working...