Comment Re:Point and Shoot? (Score 1) 38
You're right, we should cool off and try less hotly-debated subjects like world trade.
You're right, we should cool off and try less hotly-debated subjects like world trade.
You spent real money for your latte. Now cough up your real name for YouTube!
Nah. They'll have Microsoft Cloud Drive Storage Tablet Edition (also available for desktops...and also the only one you can use on desktops).
You assume Obama isn't entirely for such sanctions, post-Assange and Manning. How cute.
That will only dignify ARM Restricted Boot. There's no reason to let Microsoft (or Apple and friends) allow some architectures to be useful and others to be outright sealed to their hardware; this will just embolden them to make all PCs jailbreak-required. Best to just not purchase RT, and wait for a real ARM alternative.
Also, Ubuntu. So there's 2 reasons I can't support. Sorry.
One of the infected was Ms. Jenkins, whose grandmother, her guardian, hadn't vaccinated her as a young child. "I was afraid of the autism," says the grandmother, Margaret Mugford, 63 years old. "It was in all the papers and on TV."
Now something else is all over them. Grats.
Probably better for us than Icahn's financial sociopathy.
"Got chainz so tight, dey outshinin' mah photosphere..."
It would be just a long-winded WTFPL, if WTFPL had explicit waivers of specific rights and a minimal-license fallback for places that don't have a public domain (or worse, dump rights-waived works into the hands of RIAA-like industry groups).
CC0 is, sadly, necessary for those regions, to properly leave works to the people.
I say we petition Jesus to get back down here and flip some tables, for this and other things.
They marked csrss.exe as a DRM-related "protected process", even though it has nothing to do with DRM.
Don't be silly. Windows is DRM, at least as far as the MS of today is concerned. It was less enforced by software as by its EULA. Now they (wrongly) feel they have the technical prowess and ethical freeplay to make Windows use even more of itself to "protect" itself.
America gives millions to Muzzie savages in the hope that they will somehow agree to get on, ignore the teachings of Mohammed, and join with non-muslims to form an enlightened democracy. Millions spend defending the "rights" of muzzie murderers.
Or maybe it's just to use the money to make those (and other) countries assume that they'll get it and budget accordingly, and thus keep them dependent and subservient to the money for later bludgeoning.
"Sure you can let that fugitive of ours go...and we can also...uh...accidentally forget our next aid payment. Wouldn't want your kids to starve or anything right? Right? Goooood. Cough'im up."
And please tell me why my phonebill is through-the-roof despite the bugs and the interference!
Could be because of the two, if they had to pay to buy or install any of them.
But this being Zynga, the same bunch of numbnuts that hired the "just deal with it" guy from MSFT to be their new CEO?
I actually had to fact-check that one. Not because I thought you were lying but because I didn't think Zynga could be even more overt assholes than they already were. Sure enough you're right.
No, could is correct, as in "it could have been secure but we put it on that silly clusterfuck network instead".
This restaurant was advertising breakfast any time. So I ordered french toast in the renaissance. - Steven Wright, comedian