Comment Re:mechanisms that are not yet fully understood (Score 1) 670
Yea, no thank you here either...
Yea, no thank you here either...
Those are not side effects, they are contraindications. Big difference.
I can tell you stopped reading at the end of what you quotes. Go the fuck back and fucking read what he said.
I'd expect dropping the subsidy will do nothing beyond pushing them to find an even cheaper source of sugar.
You must not sleep much.
Up at 7:15-7:30, out by 8. Home by 7, maybe 8. Gotta be in bed by 11 if I want to get enough sleep.
That leaves me at most 4 hours of free time to do everything else I need or want to do. Spending 1/4 of that cooking something for dinner and lunch is not acceptable.
Those contraindications look pretty standard to me (except the deformed penis thing... that's a little bit left field)
I love my new signature...
I must not be reading something correctly, because I'm interpreting what the AC said as it being incredibly lethal...
not getting an MMR measles mumps rubella shot is just criminal.
Thanks. The first shot almost killed me, and I was told that any boosters or retries later in life might finish the job. Glad to know I'm a criminal for that.
Sure, it sucks for the kids, but let's not pretend that the measles are fatal with the exception of a tiny fraction of cases.
Huh? Quoth wikipedia:
Between the years 1987 and 2000, the case fatality rate across the United States was 3 measles-attributable deaths per 1000 cases, or 0.3%. In underdeveloped nations with high rates of malnutrition and poor healthcare, fatality rates have been as high as 28%. In immunocompromised patients (e.g. people with AIDS) the fatality rate is approximately 30%.
But it's usage on computers has, for the 20 or so years before VOIP was common, been text-only. Witness items such as IRC, ICQ, AIM, etc.
Anyway I did not realize WebRTC was not actually one of these kinds of things, pavon incorrectly described "real-time audio and video" as "web chat."
I apologize. I was going off of:
"WebRTC, which is a new standard for browser-based chatting."
Blame pavon.
Web chatting is just that - chat. Thus my confusion.
First time I've seen that, I apologize. I was going off of:
"WebRTC, which is a new standard for browser-based chatting."
Web chatting is just that - chat. Thus my confusion.
What does lip reading have anything to do with chat (ie, text communication)?
Then use a VOIP solution.
If you have a procedure with 10 parameters, you probably missed some.