Wouldn't stealing your phone also give them loads of other personal information? And the first thing you think of is they will have your facebook account?

Is to make sure they are fastened down properly!

Geez, get a new editor!

I didn't remove it, imgur must do that. I took it with my Motorola Droid.

http://i.imgur.com/zLQCJ.jpg

"and WTF sueing someone for half a milion dollars for this? only in america"

Or in Africa?

No worries. It is very likely that she is grandfathered in; I remember when the merger happened and I thought I was going to get a "circle" but it didn't happen.

I don't disagree that Verizon is evil, I just don't think they have anything to do with this and your initial post was incorrect in some basic facts so I assumed fanboy. :-) That doesn't appear to be the case and I do apologize.

It's interesting that you said it was because of Verizon, because on my Droid Google Voice is allowed. I can't vouch for the "my 5" fave list removal, because I don't have a fave list. You mention that it is available on all plans and that is not true. At least for family plans, you must be on a plan that has at least 1400 minutes. My wife and I have a plan with 700 minutes and it has no option for any numbers. And it is 10, not 5.

Your post seems to be FUD, but I'll let others decide for themselves.

At first I thought it meant to "assassinate" as in... Lee Harvey Oswald. Did I get it right? Or do I need to visit google?

FYI they aren't using the microwave to reheat the burger, it is to melt the cheese. No cheese, no microwave. *This is based on my experience working at BK in high school

No it isn't.

There are dumb people everywhere... not just WV. But I suppose the joke was too easy to make so we can't blame you.

Aren't you going to have to got to the website and enter your login information to pay the bill anyhow?

(I am assuming that anyone who wants paperless billing is also going to pay bills paperlessly--that is to say, online)

Did anyone else notice that all the Nintendo games mentioned are first party games? I always thought that was exaggerated, but I guess it has some backing evidence.

But if they are screwing with his traffic, then he won't accept it! :-)

So at what point in the post above is proof offered that the ISP serving take down notices will ultimately lead said ISP snooping any and all data for any third party that asks for it?

I also fail to see how my suggestion that it is slippery slope/fallacy is off-topic. It is entirely on-topic; I am suggesting that the reply to my initial comment is not valid. Maybe I was incorrect with my assertion, but that doesn't make it off-topic! ::face palm:: *this wasn't directed at fredklein, but I didn't want to make another post.