I would think that if I, chose, to photograph my home. I would also get to chose what is visible in the yard, through the windows, in the drive, etc.
I can chose to share photos I chose to take, any way I want. I took them, they are how I want my property presented, they don't invade my privacy.
Having Google driving onto my property and take photos is completely different, and the judge seems to agree.
I would have awarded them more than $1.
They need to find something they authored in the street view photos, and then sue Google for copyright infringement for each use of the image.
I hear that copyright infringement can get tens of thousands of dollars per shared item.