Read full article here: http://siliconangle.com/blog/2012/09/26/serious-flaws-detected-in-oracle-database-may-lead-to-data-leaks/#"
Because, at that time I lacked the business acumen to take advantage of it... I had led the development of postscript based high resolution mapping and even got our agency to receive national awards for the work. My first inclination was to give lectures to other GIS-folk on how to do it themselves. My first presentation was 20 minutes of me talking as fast as I could and a room full of people who looked like a pterodactyl had just swooped over their heads... complete and utter incomprehension
At that point, other ArcInfo users started hiring me on contract to apply the methods to their systems, and even then I horribly undercharged them for the work and spent my own time training their people to take it over
That is to say, I had no idea on how to profit from my knowledge and I missed on out on a prime opportunity because of it
I'll agree with you that obscure hacks suck, even more so when they are rife with regular expressions and scant man pages like awk and sed...
My approach was to do things in a repeatable manner so that the next time that I ran into the problem I already had a solution in my head that I could either apply directly, or extend in a common manner to handle the problem at hand. I can not tell you how much it pisses me off to have a single developer apply a different solution each time they run into the same problem... The big things (many to many relationships and cursor processing) took me a couple of week-long headaches to get a handle on, but the pain resulted in re-usable code that I would apply repeatedly (eventually I switched from Infos to pl/sql and started making my work more reusable with calls to stored procedures). Honestly, when I read my own code it might as well just be comments because it is based on an internal approach that I already understand. With larger teams I have had to write (and ask others to write) more universal comments, but at least I can communicate to them the reasons for the effort and the benefits that they will receive
I really do feel sorry for the person who ran into the first dynamic segmentation project that I worked up... But, that was what the 'jerk' me wanted to happen anyways
That depends, do you see PT Barnum as a 'lying weasel' or the most successful entrepreneur of his age?
You and I might know that there is never enough bandwidth... but try explaining to an accountant, stock analyst or other such ROI-based thinker that they should spend a few billion on an international, built from the ground up, communications network. It is a hard sale...
However, get Mr Crowe to float an article in Wired magazine about what it would take to deliver a retina-resolution immersive environment to tens of millions of users and BANG, Level3 was the darling of its era (and still alive today at 1% of it peak stock value)
So there you go, the planet's biggest, baddest network was funded on PT Barnum-like premises... Was that a bad thing? Do you like leasing 10GB Ethernet links for the same cost of a T3 under ATT's reign? Could a bad-ass engineer in a white shirt, clip-on tie and pocket protector have done a better job of it?
So yeah, we definitely need the PT Barnums, in my mind the issue is communicating to BOTH sides that they really do need each other
I have been the jerk and karma has certainly made me pay
About 20 years ago I was working on GIS for a local government. The challenge was to present our Pavement Management System data (from a beloved DG Mini) on our spiffy new GIS system. I proposed using dynamic segmentation (new concept in ArcInfo 6) and set about learning what needed to be done. My boss assigned his bestest buddy to ride along on this and even split the coding responsibilities down the middle... The bestest buddy decided to work in awk and sed instead of the software tools that were part of ArcInfo... Pissed me off so much that I kept all documentation in my head and set about finding another job. When I left, it took them about three years to get back on track...
As luck would have it, I walked into a new job where people had been pulling the same stunt for the last decade. Every day of my life was debugging undocumented code and re-creating wheels. These days I invest a lot of time into cross training, documentation and making certain that my developers are happy
I got mine about 3 years ago, it is part of my transition from technical 'jerk' to affable manager
A 'good' businessman is part PT Barnum and part Blackbeard the pirate, it takes a lot of puffery and cut throat decision making to get a business afloat and frankly, 20 odd years of writing code and jockeying servers really had not prepared me for it.
As a technical person I was looked at as essential to the success of the company, but it was a bit of a risk to bring me into business meetings since I might quote something out of Alice in Wonderland, identify the immediate failings of our business plan or rant about the need to spend a bunch of money to shore up security before doing anything else... stuff that business-people would rather ignore once that they are in PT Barnum mode
My solution is a technical one... put your technical jerks in a DMZ, control your ports of access in and out of the DMZ, give them the resources that they need and (if you really want to trot them out in public) invest a few years in preparing them to be 'seen' by non-techies
BTW, if you really think that all of the 'jerks' are technical and not the business people, then you are missing out on the other half of the story
and that is called, 'returning shareholder value'
Car manufacturers have always allowed defective products into the field, as long as the costs (lawsuits, bad press) do not outweigh the benefits (PROFIT!)
Of course, they already have lawyers on retainer, and 'good relationships' with the media outlets, so that can cover most complaints by simply quashing them with legal briefs and keeping the complainants from ever getting media coverage
There was a long period of time when MS seemed to follow that model, but they seemed to have gotten on their game in the past few years, hopefully this is not a sign that they are falling back to the lowest level of service that they can give to security issues without getting sued
Sorry, your explanation does not explain that mid-western product 'Dry Aged Beef'
Apparently it is very common in the mid-west to take a perfectly fine piece of beef and leave it laying about in a cold room so that the connective tissue starts to rot and the beef becomes more tender and tasty (or so my friends from that region claim)
As to your taste-theory of spice... there is pretty clear historical record of traditional Pepper being used to spice rotting meat in Europe (and thus the popularity of foreign spices in that region, and the Spanish calling chiles, peppers to build up sales), but the high use of chiles in 'local' cultures may have more to do with the rush of endorphins that it creates than anything else
I chose fresh chiles, because too many thai food places just pile a bunch of dried cayenne on top of an existing dish when you want it 'thai spicy' instead of cooking the dish from the ground up with fresh thai chiles
That said, I do some relatively evil things with the habanero and caribbean hot peppers that I grow at home. So far my favorite is to blend the fresh chiles with lime juice and salt until it is a liquid paste and keep it in the fridge to add to everything from store-bought salsa to home cooking
Kind of a shaggy dog story there, the alternative shaggy dog story to yours is that (as of 1999, I'm old) the only way to make a Windows NT server meet B2 security requirements was to remove the network card, keyboard and monitor and keep the machine in a locked room with no physical access.
In context to the story, the thing that slays your dragon (complex passwords, etc) is a token system like openid, which is aided in great length by integrated private key exchanges
The push back that you will get at this point is from executives (OpenID is EXPENSIVE) and BOFHs (key exchanges make your head hurt), but it is always fun to torment those groups, particularly after you discover that some knucklehead has used your SAN to store DVDs on
Life in the state of nature is solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. - Thomas Hobbes, Leviathan