How would one go about running a video game on a dumb terminal? Cellular networks don't have enough throughput to support a lot of OnLive/Gaikai style streaming, and plenty of games are too twitch-sensitive for cellular Internet latency to keep the game enjoyable.

WebGL doesn't work at all on iOS anyway apart from iAds.

As I understand the actual text of the statute, the reason in the counter-claim must be "mistake or misidentification". The notice of claimed infringement includes an assertion that the use "is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law." If you have a license from the copyright owner (such as the GPL), then the use is "authorized by the copyright owner", and if your use is covered under some statutory defense such as fair use, then it is "authorized by [...] the law". In either case, the copyright owner made a "mistake" by sending a notice where there is no infringement. I'm not a lawyer, but it would appear to me that an alleged infringer can demonstrate enough of a "good faith belief" to avoid a "knowing material misrepresentation" by summarizing the legal theory of a noninfringement defense in the counter-notice.

But it's still not the formation of a diploid cell from two haploid cells. I admit that my first draft of a "distinct DNA" criterion was incomplete.

I intended it to apply only to causing the death of distinct, recognizably human organisms.

Then let me try to refine this definition: to voluntarily cause the extinction of a human diploid cell line originating from a diploid node with haploid parents. Again, I admit that this definition is not final.

DMCA requires that the service provider wait no fewer than ten and no more than fourteen days after forwarding the counter-notification and then put it back up if the service provider has not received notice of suit in that period.

The article is about eavesdropping on probe requests that a device sends. In my proposal, a device would first listen for signals from GPS satellites to narrow the list of hidden SSIDs before determining which probe requests to send. Could you explain how using a GPS receiver to narrow down these probe requests would be "potentially even more intrusive"?

If by "wifi list" you mean the list of known SSIDs on a device, that can be solved by using your device's user switching and making some SSIDs private to one user. Unfortunately, Android doesn't seem to implement multi-user for devices with screens smaller than 7 inches, and I don't know whether known SSIDs are user-specific or system-wide.

If by "wifi list" you mean the topic of the article (a list collected by someone listening for probe requests for hidden SSIDs), an SSID will appear only if 1. it has a hidden SSID, and 2. your device sends probe requests automatically instead of manually, and 3. your device doesn't use cellular or GPS location to determine which SSIDs' probe requests to send.

For the sake of the user's privacy, operating systems need to default to manually sending probe requests. If that isn't convenient enough, and the device has cellular or GPS sensors, then when the user turns on Wi-Fi, the device could briefly turn on cellular and GPS radios and trilaterate nearby towers and satellites in order to determine which SSID's probe request to send.

Or MozStumbler, from the makers of Firefox.

But if you're looking for something similar on iOS, you won't find anything on the App Store because there's no public API to log seen SSIDs on iOS. Instead of making a public API, Apple instead just decided to blacklist the entire category of applications in March 2010.

I'm not sure what you're getting at because the vast majority of UK subjects, those born in Britain to a British parent or naturalized in Britain, are officially called "British citizens".

Among sufficiently affluent English-speaking countries, the United States has a supermajority of potential customers. Into how many languages will you need to translate your product or service to reach the next 330 million potential customers?

It's harder in cases where your customer's work contains a portion of someone else's work, and your customer and the copyright owner disagree on whether this use is a fair use.

Support in both houses would have been enough to override a veto.