But we have to pass the bill so you can, uh, find out what's in it.
Perhaps you could provide a link to a the entire "context" so people can judge for themselves? Relying on your word seems so... shallow of thought.
psychological and sociological studes
These are not fields of science other than as repositories of anecdotal evidence. The vast bulk of each discipline's studies and experiments cannot be reproduced. You venture correctly.
Took 29 minutes to get from the story being posted to "CLIMATE SCIENTIST ARE LIREZ!!11!!1"
He neither said that nor implied it. What he said was that any criticism of AGW is met with a defense akin to a religious fervor. This is a true statement.
Let me try to explain this in simple terms for you. People do not blame Linux for Knight's trading losses because *they do not believe* the error had nothing to do with Linux. People do blame Microsoft for the LSE outage because *they believe* it had everything to do with Microsoft.
Emphasis added. You reversed the negative on your first phrase (should have be anything), but it's still a religious argument.
The bogosity meter just pegged.