My first XT-clone had a 30MB RLL drive
Mine had a 40MB drive. It was an Amstrad PC1640-HD20, but the stock 20MB hard disk had been replaced with a 40MB one. It had 640KB of RAM, which DOS used quite nicely, but DOS 3.3 was still limited to FAT-12, meaning partitions could not be bigger than 32MB, so I had an 8MB C: for booting and a 32MB D: for everything else. It ran Windows 3.0 reasonably, although running more than one application at once generally popped up some kind of resource-exhausted dialog (memory, GDI handles, whatever).
The first SSD I bought was for my Psion Series 3. It was 128KB and cost £30. It was a single cell, so every write used up some of the capacity and you could only get it back by formatting the disk (erasing everything). Deleting files just marked them in the filesystem as invisible and overwriting a portion of a file just appended the data and updated the file metadata, so you could fill up the drive just by compulsively saving the current document periodically.
What can Apple's connector do that micro USB can't?
A great many things. The dock connector has pins for:
In contrast, micro USB has pins for:
You can, for example, use an iPod dock to directly drive a TV (useful for presentations - Keynote will export for the iPod so you can give presentations without needing to take anything bigger than an iPod with you). The second audio output in the dock means that you don't need to unplug the headphones when you drop the device in the dock. I don't think the FireWire pins are connected anymore, which is a shame because that allowed simple device-to-device connectivity (and, for example, plugging in an external hard drive directly to the device without needing a computer - iPod Linux let you do this and so did some other third-party firmware).
The main reason why cellphone manufacturers switch to connectors that are 0.05mm smaller than the previous version, is to sell more spare adapters
Who does this? I've only owned phones from Siemens, Sony Ericsson and Nokia, but they've all been compatible with chargers from the previous generation. The only exception is Nokia, but they included an adaptor with each phone that let you use it with the older charger for several years after moving to the newer form factor.
Your argument would make sense if it weren't for the fact that it's been possible to buy cheaper third-party chargers for all of the major phone brands for at least a decade. A more likely observation is that it encourages a form of lock in. I have a Nokia phone, and Nokia chargers are standard across their line and you can buy third party ones for under £5, so I have a few lying around. If I buy a new Nokia phone, I already have a load of spare chargers for it. If I buy a {someone else} phone, I need to buy spare chargers on top of the phone. Given two phones at the same price, the Nokia one is cheaper in total.
That said, I really wish more manufacturers would adopt the charging system from the Palm Pre - I love the idea of just popping the phone down on a flat surface and having it start charging. I've had enough flimsy phone charger connections snap to not really trust any physical connection that needs plugging in and unplugging repeatedly.
I am not a lawyer or an American, so take this with a pinch or two of salt:
DUI is a state offence, and each state sets its drink driving limits differently[1], so you need a state judge to approve a warrant for performing a blood test to determine whether someone is guilty. In contrast, HIPAA and the fourth amendment constitutional protection against unreasonable search and seizure are both Federal laws, meaning that a violation will be tried by a Federal judge. A state with state judges in its pocket can still find itself in trouble for violating federal law.
[1] Although a certain pressure group (Mothers Against Canada or something) has made is to that the state doesn't receive any federal funding for roads if they don't meet certain requirements.
Corollary one: Any object in orbit around a body with mass has an external force applied to it.
Corollary two: Any object in the solar system is part of an n-body problem and has lots of external forces applied to it.
If you notify Google of people violating their patent, and they do nothing and you record the fact, then their patent can be thrown out in court
New rule: people who comment on stories involving patents have to learn the difference between patents and trademarks.
All that latches means (in the USA - lots of places don't even have this rule for patents) is that you can't claim any damages that occur between becoming aware of the violation and sending the cease and desist. You can still wait for 5 years for a competitor to become large, send the C&D, and then sue them for any violations that occur afterwards.
GPLv2 says they have an obligation to provide source to ANY third party
Not true. They may have such an obligation, but only if they did not provide the source along with the binary. Actually, they never quite have that obligation. According to clause 3b of GPLv2, they have to provide a written offer good for three years to provide the source to any third party, but after three years they don't have to provide the source, and they don't have to provide the source to anyone who did not receive this written offer (either from them, or as a result of someone else satisfying clause 3c).
is that really so difficult to understand?
Apparently so.
Some insist anything linked against the kernel libraries (making calls to the kernel) must be make source code available. But I do not believe this is the general consensus.
It's more complex than that. Drivers do not have to be GPL'd, unless they are a derived work of the kernel. If they are not (e.g. the nVidia blob drivers), then they may be distributed under any license that you wish.
The kernel, however, requires that anything linked to it be distributed under a GPL-compatible license. Any Linux kernel that links against things under a license that the GPL is incompatible with, is in violation of the GPL. The GPL, however, makes it clear that you do not require any license to use the code, so end users may download the Linux kernel and the nVidia drivers, link them together, and still be allowed to use the code.
What they can't do is distribute the result. If you distribute the Linux kernel along with a GPL-incompatible driver, then you are in violation of the GPL. This means that you have no valid license to distribute the Linux kernel (unless you acquire one from all of the Linux copyright holders), and so every time you copy the kernel you are committing copyright infringement. Shipping a device with binary-only drivers and a Linux kernel is almost certainly wilful infringement, and carries a statutory penalty of up to $150K in the USA. It's probably cheaper to use FreeBSD...
Stellar rays prove fibbing never pays. Embezzlement is another matter.