Criticism of Gladwell is more extensive. [shameproject.com]
Lol, that site is about as far from impartial as you can get.
"No, no, no... They don't say his writing lacks facts to back it up. They only have issues with the fact that he's drawing conclusions out of his ass and making up a 'better' version of facts cause he didn't understand the original, boring ones."
Not sure where that came from, it is not a quote from my reply to you or wikipedia. You do not source it, so not really sure how it pertains to anything unless it is what you are saying, in which case I am just confused by the quotation marks around it.
And no... that's not the "main thrust of criticism". THAT is just the criticism aimed at his books.
That WAS the main thrust of the criticism on the wikipedia page linked to originally though.