Journal Journal: Mini rant: Stupid code 2
Not only does this code have stupid constants, it has stupid code:
Not only does this code have stupid constants, it has stupid code:
We need to balance the benefits of patents (disclosure) with the detriments (short term artificial monopoly).
Have you read modern patents? They consist of dense legalese that's of no practical value to technologists. And twenty years is not "short term" in computing... our industry proceeds much faster than that.
MS Stack software developer
says it all. I almost stopped reading at that. MS stack is going bye-bye. And if there's one thing that is *not* lacking in *Seatle* it's MS 'talent'.
Try this: Advertise yourself as a Linux stack guy of same skill level, and look how many interviews you get with that. I'd bet measurably more.
Good luck.
I am looking at a stored PROCEDURE as it takes too long to run. Besides the CURSORs, DECODE()s where NVL() should be used, and a UNION, there exists this stupidity up front:
csSpace CONSTANT CHAR(1)
cnZero CONSTANT NUMBER(1)
How many things can you spot that is just plain wrong with that?
What part of this confuses you? He was arrested, after much consultation, for a crime he admits doing, that a policeman caught him doing, which the school did not give permission for him to do, petty though it is.
Two parts: (1) traditionally, the availability of a readily accessible power outlet has been a cue that the outlet is available for (free) use by everyone who's authorized to be in the area. It's not a theft because--in the language of our existing social norms and conventions--the receptacle is actually an invitation unless there's specific signage to the contrary. If you don't believe that, well, then you'd better not charge your personal cell phone at work, plugin your laptop at the airport, or hookup your GPS to your buddy's lighter port without getting explicit permission.
And (2) the part about it being only 5 cents. It does society no good to saddle innocent, productive citizens with criminal records for a 5-cent infraction. That's just crazy. Seeing things in such black-and-white terms creates a user-hostile society that is focused on legalism and pedantry to the exclusion of real justice.
Mailing label. Duh!
You know, ever since i started asking people, i realized how smart other people were.
Thanx.
I was looking for a job and an interview required references. I decided to put down an erstwhile supervisor and coworker, but only after aksing their permission. They both agreed, and i never heard back from that (first) place. (Not because of bad reviews, the head hunter explained they were excellent.)
And here i thought it was stage left, exit.
A cookbook?
Walmart has a Slinky for $3.00. The description says: Clearance! Was $1.86. That seemed backwards.
So, i sent an email from their website:
Metal Slinky http://www.walmart.com/ip/Metal-Slinky/882938#Q%26A+Exchange
says the price is $3.00. The description says "Clearance! Was $1.86" Isn't that backwards? Because it went to clearance the price went up?
I'm sure its nothing that a can of spray-paint and some bubble-gum can't deal with.
Don't get to cocky about your options in an orwellian/cyberpunk future.
The corps in turn are sure your spray-paint and bubble-gum tactic is nothing 99.999% reliability facial-recognition + cell-phone tracking + behavioural-and-movement-pattern-recognition + god-knows-what can't deal with by tracking you down, sueing you into next wednesday, locking your creditcards/bankaccounts for that specific mall (all all others connected to the same megacorp and data-exchange conglumerate), putting you on a special surveillance & potential terrorist threat list, ban you from accessing gated communities of type X,Y and Z until further notice and upping your rent for being a threat to society all for spraying and gumming up their new survelliance & minion control bot toy.
Just saying.
Neutrinos have bad breadth.