Comment Moo (Score 1) 12
I feel similarly.
I won't touch FB though.
I feel similarly.
I won't touch FB though.
So I was reading xkcd and it made me think about
This is the UI of a nerd. Not as clumsy or random as facebook; an elegant UI for a more civilized age.
Though maybe this is more accurate:
Slashdot dot org: You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious.
The typical U.S. household headed by a person age 65 or older has a net worth 47 times greater [boston.com] than a household headed by someone under 35. This wealth gap is now more than double what it was in 2005 and nearly five times the 10-to-1 disparity a quarter-century ago.
Isn't that as it should be, after working and saving all your life? Net worth includes possessions, house, savings for retirement, etc. Also, take the aging one-percenters (or the 0.1%) out of the numbers (or use median instead of mean) and I bet the disparity growth is a lot flatter. Fundamentally, there's a difference b/t being well off because you worked hard all your life and being well off because you (1) owned the means of productions, (2) bought off legislators, and (3) found a way to exploit others.
It would imply that the NSA is decades ahead of academia in not only cryptography but almost every area of computer science. Considering how inefficient and incompetent the rest of the government is (even the DoD, i.e. unencrypted drones) I just cannot believe that is the case.
In 1995, NSA added a single bit-rotation to SHA that made it considerably stronger, but they didn't explain their reasoning at the time. It took several more years before academia found significance weaknesses, with 2004 being the year that SHA-0 (as the original, non-rotated version is now called) was really cracked wide open. That (arguably) puts them about a decade ahead (in a situation where they willingly tipped their hand). These folks employee the most math PhD's in the world and have their own chip fabs... it's not hard to imagine them being two decades ahead on some important cryptographic questions.
Not a fan of Apple peripherals. I like their monitors, but not at that price.
Ditto.
Early testers have noted they "feel quite anonymous and undetectable" wearing the tinfoil hat, with no less than three extra layers of tinfoil to keep the NSA out.
For an extra $50, users can get a banner reading "Don't mind me, I'm anonymous." attached at no extra cost.
Reading EurekAlert! i came across Computer program lets users learn keyboard shortcuts with minimal effort, making me think they finally caught up with emacs.
The project page is even more interesting, raised keys and all.
Heh. I'm using my mac mini (to type this comment) with a "Windows" keyboard and mouse. Which many people to find more functional than the apple thin, no spaces stuff. Then again, apple keyboard functional is quite lacking.
I've been logging in lately, posting JEs and commenting (read:fishing), just because.
And now i have mod points. That's just weird. I don't care. No, that's not right. I shouldn't care, but i do.
I hate myself.
I'm tempted to get an ipad (after i get a job and have the money to purchase it), but every time i pick up one of these pad devices, i find myself at a loss for how to use it. It's like it's the exact opposite of a functional device, instead being flashy and smooth, and whatever.
So why do i want an ipad? Well, it's a nice computer to run those nifty apps, and is more convenient than a laptop.
Wait, wait, i'm rambling again.
This excerpt from Civilization in Transition (The Collected Works of C. G. Jung, Volume 10), page 20, paragraphs 27 and 28 is both right and wrong (italics, his):
I'm a long-time Google Apps user, and my company's domain is on all mail receipents' mail, not "gmail.com". So how can you have implied consent when the sender doesn't know that the mail is being sent through Google?
Genetics explains why you look like your father, and if you don't, why you should.