Slashdot is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Weird! (Score 2) 470

All the comments on that book about "3 felonies a day" say:

... This is the first sentence of the book description. It's the most exciting concept in the book. I wanted to know what felonies "I" was committing. However, I am not out in the woods gathering shell casings from federal land, politicking my way through life, doctoring or practicing law. Where is the chapter on the common man?...

You can find more there, but in essence, there is no mention of what 3 felonies the "common man" is doing per day. Is there any? Is this not FUD?

Don't get me wrong, I think everyone should have privacy, and we do have "stuff" to hide, but I also believe in the truth, and it would seem you, and that book, are spreading FUD.

Submission + - Significant security flaw found in SIM cards (www.cbc.ca)

iONiUM writes: From the article: "A German cryptographer has uncovered a security bug in mobile phones that could enable hackers to remotely attack at least half a billion phones." More technically, from the register: "Pedigree security researcher Karsten Nohl has apparently discovered two unrelated flaws in implementations of the GSM standard that (when combined) could leave millions of SIM cards vulnerable to attack."

Comment Re:MSRP of $62,400 Though? (Score 1) 452

I could buy a car for $5k to get me to/from work, or a car for $100k to also get me to/from work.

Assuming both are reliable, what's the difference other than class/comfort/social statement/etc.? So, yes, if you want to compare "a car" vs. "public transit" vs. "no way at all to get around", it is an "investment", but I think it's pretty obvious that what I was referring to was buying a high end car when you only need to get from a-to-b and a cheaper car would do.

Comment Re:MSRP of $62,400 Though? (Score 2) 452

I'm not arguing against using money to enjoy life; I am a strong supporter of dying with $0 to your name.

That said, it's become common in North American lifestyle that a $500/mo car expense is both expected, and normal, and people take it on in lieu of saving for retirement, or having a disposable income for things they want (and then use credit to get those things anyways).

As I said in an above post, if you truly can afford a $60k car, then you can afford to pay cash for it upfront, and not care about it, because you have enough money to replace it easily. That's the marker of being able to afford a car at a particular price. If losing your job means you're going to go broke in 2 months because of your car payments, you can't afford it.

Comment Re:MSRP of $62,400 Though? (Score 1) 452

That's great, the net >$500/mo... what about rent/mortgage + food + disposable income + savings for retirement + bills? Oh wait, who saves for retirement anymore.

A $500/mo car payment is not a requirement, that is all I'm getting at. If you can afford a $60k car, then you should be able to afford to pay for it with cash. And, you should have enough money that you don't care if the car gets scratched, or otherwise damaged, because you can easily replace it.

Comment Re:MSRP of $62,400 Though? (Score 4, Interesting) 452

According to this article from 2012, the average purchase price of a new car was $30,748 and increasing.

Seeing as that's about half the MSRP, I suppose it's not totally out of reach.

Personally I have no idea why people spend this kind of money on a car. My last brand new car (I don't usually buy brand new, but they had a lot of incentives) was about $16k (cdn), and I considered that a lot. A car is not an investment.....

Comment Korean Air now one of the most safest (Score 5, Informative) 423

Submission + - Carbon dioxide not the cause of global warming? (therecord.com)

iONiUM writes: From the article: "An in-depth statistical analysis of ozone depletion, temperature changes, gasses and cosmic rays by University of Waterloo professor of physics and astronomy Qing-Bin Lu suggests that chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) have been the key cause of global warming since the 1970s."
And the good news: "By the middle of this century we should have recovery of the ozone hole to the 1980s level," Is it really possible we've already solved man-caused global warming?

Slashdot Top Deals

"The sixties were good to you, weren't they?" -- George Carlin

Working...