I don't know... if you are referring to it as "US-occupied CSA" then at best you probably could only count the counties you have been to!
But since you refer to EPCOT with the one true capitalization scheme you probably aren't one of those types, though for extra bonus points you could have called it "The EPCOT Center"
(so far I've only been to 3 countries outside of the Americas)
This argument is a perfect example that just blindly following a single party is not good for democracy.
Unfortunately most people are lazy and will just go with one of the two parties and assume/pretend that that party either is completely aligned with them, or even worse, will adopt the same position on a given issue as their party since the "other guys" have taken the opposite position (i.e. "I don't care about about X but since my party is for it and the other guys are against it I will be for it.")
We have to look at each politician as an individual - not as a Rep/Dem/Indp - with their own stands on the various issues we care about. Unfortunately there is usually just one or two issues (abortion/Iraq/death penalty/etc.) which decide our entire opinion on that one politician.
"Confound these ancestors.... They've stolen our best ideas!" - Ben Jonson