Follow Slashdot stories on Twitter

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror

Comment Re:Size does matter. (Score 1) 294

I kinda hear that, about size, but I agree with the others who say that until you've tried to lug around a great big tablet, you don't realize the advantage of the smaller size. Pinch-to-zoom can take you a long way with devices like this.

That said, yeah, I've had a Surface Pro for a while and I've never really said, "Whoah, I gotta fire up Photoshop and try out that pen!" So maybe the screen does want to be just a little bit bigger for that.

Comment Re:Lesson not learned (Score 5, Informative) 331

If you're not charging people for your images, then leeches aren't stealing anything.

Except your bandwidth. Image leeches typically do things like linking your images to their MySpace page, or using them as the background image for some other website full of ad spam links, so you end up paying for their site. It wouldn't be so bad if they just "stole" your images by downloading them and using them themselves. The problem is that they don't download your images.

Comment Re:I beg to differ, sir (Score 1) 340

Prototypes of a modern calculator could be coded in Java-Script or Dart and presented
on a browser.

I seriously question whether JavaScript's internal number representation would be accurate enough to implement a calculator for use in education. All numbers in JavaScript are represented as double-precision floats, which IMHO are not going to be accurate enough for engineering or science use (except, perhaps, with some very fancy footwork on the part of the developer).

Also, my understanding is that phones, tablets and the like are not allowed in classrooms precisely because their broad programmability makes it easy for students to cheat. How hard would it be for a student to flip back and forth between an app that looks like a calculator and a browser window with all the answers in it? Hardware calculators offer educators some assurance that this isn't happening.

Comment Re:No they're not... (Score 1) 622

We have 90%+ herd immunity on measles.

If that level is not sufficient, then one needs to question whether the concept of herd immunity is valid.

You're confusing statistical herd immunity with factual herd immunity. If 90% of people in the United States have herd immunity, but a particular community of 2,000 people has only a 10% vaccination rate, then there is no herd immunity within that community.

Comment Re:No they're not... (Score 5, Insightful) 622

If not, then . . . who cares?

People who can't get vaccinated for medical reasons, for instance because they're babies and too young to get the vaccine yet, or they have compromised immune systems (for one reason or another). People in these groups have to rely on otherwise healthy people to do the right thing and get vaccinated.

Comment Leaked? (Score 5, Interesting) 427

So where did Der Spiegel get these documents? On Friday, Edward Snowden accused the US government of intentionally leaking documents to The Independent that were potentially damaging, in an effort to discredit the responsible reporting being done by The Guardian and the Washington Post. He said he had never worked with nor even spoken to anyone at The Independent. Is the same thing happening here?

Comment Re:A step in the right direction! (Score 2) 496

Not always, no. There are famous quotes by people from Henry Ford to Gene Roddenberry that all come down to "people don't know what they want". And it's true, if MS asked what people wanted, 90% would say XP, solely because they're used to it.

This is actually something I think about often. Steve Jobs' "genius" was that he always told people what they wanted, then gave it to them.

Microsoft, on the other hand, always CLAIMS to make changes because "that's what people want." They do endless research to see what buttons people click after they click this or that button, and then they make those buttons bigger so they're easier to click. They arrange the Office Ribbon based on what they see people doing. Everything, EVERYTHING is based on research, both through direct surveys and blind feedback from their software running in the wild... ...and yet, when they make the changes, most people seem to respond negatively. But Microsoft won't revise its changes -- or allow a smart, Steve Jobs-like human to make the decisions -- because they have all this research, so they "know" what people want. "You say you hate this? Well you're wrong, you don't hate it, and I can prove it."

TL;DR Microsoft actually seems hamstrung by its own design methodology. It designs by committee, vote, and statistical study, rather than by inspiration -- and its slavish adherence to those methods means it has a hard time recovering from its own mistakes.

Comment Re:Misleading headline (Score 1, Insightful) 496

Actually, the Start Button does include one benefit: you can right click it to get the system administrator's menu, which has a bunch of useful stuff on it. The same menu was available in Windows 8, but you had to know it was there because there was no icon to let you know about it, and there was no way to activate it on a touchscreen.

Slashdot Top Deals

Scientists are people who build the Brooklyn Bridge and then buy it. -- William Buckley

Working...