What's a little perjury when you have someone's best interests in mind, right?

Trial in absentia is the first thing that comes to mind.

I've never heard of a car that can't be switched to neutral while in drive.

(I used to do this occasionally going down an empty road (4 car/hr tops) on a steep hill. Usually got up to 35, which was enough to coast all the way to the stop sign at the top of a smaller hill.)

Intel now and then makes some real 'stand out' chips, the Q6600 is one of them. It runs pretty great for it's line and can be overclocked.

This isn't that file renaming program, is it?

Actually, they're guilty of antidisestablishmentarianism.

Since we're changing definitions, I figured I would go with something that sounds much cooler. Also, I get paid by the letter, so there's that.

I think they were referring to editorial freedom, but like most editors on Slashdot they need to take a journalism class.

So, just printing more money isn't accounting fraud?

What Internet were you visiting?

There was music sharing using WAV and others for several years before MP3, the problem was bandwidth and storage, so it was unpopular. Running LHA on a WAV didn't do much, but people did it anyway.

Is a vague concept and would be unenforceable.

There's nothing stopping you from telling everyone what you spend your token on.

I'm willing to bet if enough people go and publicly video themselves buying new games with with any gift cards that it will be enough to be an additional blurb in a news story.

Fucking Microsoft, not letting me install Android on my Zune and Xbox. It's obvious, they're trying to sell the Xbox by using the fact that it works better with Windows as a selling point.

Yeah, no. New platform, new rules. If you argue that the ARM platform and PC platform are the same, then Microsoft is not a monopoly, and the restrictions placed on them are void, including those on the x86 platform. If you don't combine them, then ARM Tablets are not related to the PC and MS is not a monopoly in ARM and is a monopoly in x86 and the restrictions placed on them apply only to x86.

So, which do you want? Let MS do what they want in the x86 market or let them compete with yet another walled garden tablet?

How much difference is there between a PPC Mac and a Dell Optiplex? They're almost identical hardware, except for the chip and both can run Firefox, so, same software, right?

In the PC market. Not in the ARM consumer tablet market.

That dominant market share of 1%?