Comment Re:Whatever (Score 1) 95
Again, you display your gross ignorance of basic science!
Colors *are* genders.
Again, you display your gross ignorance of basic science!
Colors *are* genders.
Thanks, that's very helpful.
It was pretty easy to connect back in 1997, even in rural areas:
Step 1: Walk to the mail box
Step 2: Remove the daily unsolicited floppy disk
Step 3: Follow the printed instructions
Welcome to the Information Super Highway!*
*Long distance charges may apply if you do not select a LOCAL AOLnet phone number. Please check with your local telephone company if you have a question.
However, C is not the shit that's getting decorated here
I couldn't agree more.
Try to design the lowest level language for Von Neumann architecture machines that's still cross platform and you get C.
Unless you get Forth. That happens occasionally.
They've already been shelling out free porn
People still pay for pornography? Don't they have the internet? Are they solving printouts of CAPCHA's?
Honestly, there's no need in this modern age to embarrass yourself at the gas-n-go, milling around waiting for the matronly old woman to take a break so that you can ask the pothead with the trainee badge to go round to the rack behind the counter. Anything you want is just a click away.
C# is a terrible language which epitomizes an evolutionary dead-end in programming language design.
"But it continues to change and improve!" you say. Sure, it continues to change. Have you seen C++ lately? Same problem. When you try to decorate a turd, everything just ends up covered in shit.
You didn't have Internet access in 1997?
How do you figure that?
Pitiful. I use the completely impossible to guess, unhackable, passcode 2845.
Don't be stupid. There are infinite non-repeating patterns.
iMessage became ubiquitous for a huge % of smart phone numbers
This is what delusion looks like!
The same could have been said about Apple circa 1986. "Apple has no focus, no goal,, no vision, no direction to go."
For all we know, in a few years we'll see the triumphant of the former co-CEO's as an important turning point. We'll watch Apple decline and say "Well, Apple doesn't have a Lazaridis. Not even vaguely close. Not by a light year."
I see that you have absolutely no scientific background. What's it like to be so sure of yourself with little to know knowledge of the subject?
It's undoubtedly true. Go look at the numbers. You'll be surprised.
Apple is actually selling more iPhones than ever, even if their market share is falling.
Just like BlackBerry was not very long ago...
Variables don't; constants aren't.