Yeah, it's so hard that children can easily teach themselves. It's ridiculously easy. How many of the users here taught themselves to write code before they age of 10? Face it, it doesn't take a special mind or superior intellect to write code. It does not make you special. Get over it.
Junkie logic.
That's all this is. "Look, normal weight people can be unhealthy too!" (So it's okay that I'm obese...) "Personal responsibility never works!" (So I shouldn't even try...)
If we really want to solve the societal pandemic of obesity we need to completely discard the idea that it's caused by some personal moral failing
(It's not my fault that I can't control my diet or be bothered to exercise regularly. It's society!)
I've little doubt that this post will justify that package of Oreos you'll shovel down later. Damn society, keeping you fat.
Sun come up, sun goes down, he had the only holodeck on DS9, never a miscommunication. You can't explain that.
You may want to review the term "null hypothesis".
SICP is popular right now, but I'd hardly call it divinely inspired.
I posted you a link which clearly shows:
Many states forbid either assault rifles or both kinds of weapons, e.g. New York AFAIK
Ah, I see. You just don't understand what you posted.
Give it another go. You'll figure it out. (Hint: It does support your claim. Quite the opposite, in fact.)
Let's review:
Private citizens can own handguns and assault rifles
This is true.
Many states forbid either assault rifles or both kinds of weapons, e.g. New York AFAIK
This is false.
Your earlier post supports my assertion, as it makes it very clear that the State of New York does not "forbid" "both kinds of weapons".
So
Well, it works acceptably on my BlackBerry Z10. Way better than jQuery Mobile at least, but that's not exactly a high-bar.
It works wonderfully on my bargain-basement Windows 7 netbook in Chrome 31, but doesn't work at all in FireFox 25 or IE 11.
I figure by that time it works acceptably in enough places, it'll be useless -- solving a problem no one has any more.
That's not true.
auto_ptr has been depricated
What about C++11?
That's my point entirely.
Not a single point of his stands up to any sort of logical scrutiny.
I guess you missed this part: "he's right for the wrong reasons."
I don't know why you're so defensive of the language. C++ hasn't exactly improved over the years.
I don't even know why anyone would even bother with c++. If it's a good fit, just use c.
Torvalds is right about the language; even though he's right for the wrong reasons.
It's good because it has an interactive mode?
There are better beginner languages with an interactive mode, like BASIC and Logo.
Work without a vision is slavery, Vision without work is a pipe dream, But vision with work is the hope of the world.
