It was to help the slower folks, like you, to better understand the argument he was making.

I guess it wasn't help enough.

How about that. Even atheists can be laughably irrational.

Lol, okay. Whatever you say.

Read the study? I'm impressed when someone here takes the time to read the summary!

Or you could just buy a better device and toss in an SD Card. Carry a few around with you if you need more. They're very small.

I can write a book with a telegraph key as well. That doesn't make it as good as a word processor.

If that's not to your liking, try this: I can finger-paint on my tablet yet Adobe is not concerned about losing my future business.

WebOS didn't die, it was murdered.

Why do you think it was a bad idea?

Really? They work just fine on my BlackBerry and FireFox OS phones. Chrome and FireFox for Android have had support for a while as well.

iOS seems to be the big stand-out here. Though they do support WebGL in iAds and I think you can enable it in the browser if you jailbreak.

See how ridiculous you look? From top to bottom: 1) Not a non sequitur. 2) Not in context. 3) Not even wrong. (This post would get very long if I tried to explain why just the second half of that is wrong, let alone all of it.) 4) Not a non sequitur. 5) Not a logical fallacy. 6) Not an ad hominem. (Really. Look it up.) 7) Not a non sequitur (Do you even know what that term means?) 8) Not an ad hominem (Hint: it doesn't mean "insult") 9) Not in context.

Yeah, someone might discover how laughably incompetent you truly are. I replied anyway, just because you put so much effort in to that silly nonsense. You earned a good shaming.

I can recommend a few textbooks for you, if you're actually interested in learning about logic. I suspect, however, that you're more interested in shouting "logical fallacy" incompetently on the internet to make yourself feel important.

Insightful? Amazing. You'd think that even the thickest mod would know that theology is not religion!

I'd have never believed it would work. You are truly the karma whore master.

I see that you don't understand, well, anything at all about philosophy. I can safely assume, then, that you also have no understanding of basic science.

Go ahead and work on that. Don't bother posting when you figure it out -- there's no need to humiliate yourself further.

Isn't it funny how people who makes lists of "logical fallacies" never take the time to point them out?

I don't blame them. They'd look very foolish if they tried! See, it turns out that those folks usually have no formal training in logic and are just repeating nonsense they read on a blog.

To quote ... er ... you: "Do you understand how hard you make it for yourself to be taken seriously? If you want to tell people about what is true and what is false, you have to follow the rules that allow you to determine what is true and false."

So, go ahead. Give it a go. I'll wait.

I read that too. I wouldn't honor it with a place on my shelf. It's ... not that great. It's a mix of bad philosophy and simple-minded theology written by a guy who, quite clearly, has little to no understanding of either.

The only purpose that collection of mad scribblings serves, as far as I can see, is to extract money from poorly educated atheists of below-average intelligence.

Odd, my experience has been completely different. My wife loves her PlayBook and Z10. Everyone I've shown either device to has been impressed. The slick UI, solid hardware, and fantastic dev tools ... I don't know what anyone could possibly complain about!

Consensus on Slashdot is meaningless, I know, but the sentiment here is quite clear: QNX is an excellent OS. What, specifically, do you dislike about it?

All of those things and a superior OS?

Oh, sorry. That's not what you wanted to hear.