"WRONG. This "judicial activism" stuff is crap. The courts are not suppose to blindly obey the laws congress passes. Haven't you heard of "checks and balances"? They, along with the president, are suppose to keep congress in check. Congress giving the courts "latitude" is irrelevant. The courts are suppose to strike down unjust laws (you know, things that violate the constitution)."
Where did the law validated violate the Constitution?
While I do NOT like this decision, it does seem Constitutional. Bad laws can be Constitutional, and still be BAD.