But does a Cue:Cat count?
But does a Cue:Cat count?
This is why for a long time, 50% of your phone bill was the cost of the bill.
CO-supplied POE sounds like a tall order. One of the reasons CO-powered POTS works is because the CO supplies 48VDC (90VAC@20Hz ring), but the telephone equipment has to be able to work with much less voltage than that, and serious noise on the line. I suspect most POE devices expect much cleaner power.
Also, large chunks of the switch can go down, but as long as power stays up, existing calls through that switch stay up. New calls may not happen (no dial tone), though. This was true even in the days of mechanical step-switches. The calls always stayed connected until and unless something proactively broke the connection. When they went to electronic switching in the 1970s and 1980s, much effort was spent making sure this was still true. This was one of the weapons on the circuit side of the packet-switching versus circuit-switching wars.
The present issue is the last skirmish in that war. IMO packet-switching won that war the first time a telco installed a VOIP trunk from one CO to another. Everything since has been nuts-and-bolts buildout.
(Claimer: I wrote call processing software for telephone switches in the mid-1980s.)
How long ago were those lines put in? How often are they inspected? You'd kind of expect an unmaintained 100-year-old sewer line to fail.
Part me out, pull the plug, burn me up, flush me down.
3 is prime, 5 is prime, 7 is prime, 9 is bad data, 11 is prime, 13 is prime...
I stopped flying once I proved that heavier-than-air flight is impossible.
Ham shack? 73? And you don't see the cosmic significance?
I have lots of CFLs and their lifespan varies widely. I've had some going for almost five years now, and others didn't last five months, all indoors and on roughly the same duty cycle. I don't have too many LED bulbs yet, the oldest maybe 18 months, but none of them have failed yet. I guess LEDs don't have as much "infant mortality". OTOH, we have some incandescents that were here when we bought this house 17 years ago and are still humming along.
It'd be nice if we could get a nonbiased study of lifespans, changes in output, etc., based on a decent sample size and not connected with any manufacturer.
Repeat after me: Money is not speech. Corporations are not people.
I have 2 inkjet printers which violate your rules:
1)The "Main" family inkjet. Like a lot of folks, I'm probably in the 'sweet spot" for inkjet. I print circa 1-3 pages a day, enough that the heads don't clog, and low enough that the price per page just doesn't make a laser worth it
A serious photo printer (In my case, a Canon 9500MkIII, then again, as a semi-pro photographer, I want/need the control over papers/process that I could not get from the labs (I used to use a lab). The fact that I happen to have 3 different types of fine art paper in 8.5x11, 11x17 and 13x19, to fit the job at hand is just a "Oh well, it's paper, the price of the print more than covers it"
I'm surprised nobody's mentioned this. I work on a project that's spread across eight countries. The lingua franca is English, which makes me one of the lucky ones as a native English speaker. As you might guess, it's a pretty big project, so things like push-button refactoring aren't any use when someone misspells a variable name, or inadvertently names something after a swear word or a racial slur. (Or, more to the point, did so in acquired code that's now 12 years old and really shouldn't be touched if it's been working fine, and there's no staff for cosmetic changes anyway.)
People have talked about commenting and documentation. It's that much worse when someone's writing in their third language, or they write in their native language and you hope you can translate it well enough to get what they're really trying to say.
And then you've got all the cultural issues surrounding hierarchy, face and the loss thereof, egos, power, seniority, communication formats, and all that.
I'd love to have the luxury of being the lone cowboy, even if the PHBs were constantly jerking me around about what I'm supposed to be doing.
Mint+Mate is just fine for me. Nice to know I can hack it if the need arises, though.
A successful [software] tool is one that was used to do something undreamed of by its author. -- S. C. Johnson