You are not going to have much advanced IT business left over there soon if this goes on.

I think we are witnessing the (not very) slow disintegration of the principals and reality of the American Internet. Whether the internet itself will survive this is another matter.

I don't understand why some (most) people are scared of Latex.

As a regular latex user for the last 8 years, I have to say that I am not scared of latex.

I hate latex.

I could rant forever about how latex turns writing mathematics from a joy into a constant chore, or how errors and typos can take long to fix than it took to type the document, or how pages never, ever come out satisfactorally.

But I'll just note that the biggest issue with Latex is that it has its own idea of how your document should look, and if you disagree or ever dare attempt to override its page and space wasting decisions, you are in for a world of pain.

I(and the rest fo the world) need a handwriting recognition system for written mathematics. Something I can use to prepare "typed" documents by hand, writing my mathematics whereever I will on the page. Preferably, I need this before Latex ends up giving me another ulcer.

This is actually wierdly ontopic. There is a powerful analogy between modern touchscreen development and modern games. Touchscreens and games have bother become ever flashier, commiditised, and mass marketed, and yet when I use either, I find I get less done, and ultimately less enjoyment out of the whole process than I did with traditional computers and old school games.#

If they didn't offer better prices, why would anyone trade with them?

Now you're outright misleading everyone.

Firstly: No-one chooses whom they trade with on an exchange. The exchange computers match up buyers to sellers. No-one asks for the HFT traders to come in, but has to live with the consequences of their entry as long as they continue to trade.

Secondly: While it is true that at most given instants HFT firms will currently provide the "best" price, this is not true over longer time periods. If there were enforced time delays in the exchange, sellers could wait a second or so to receive a better price, and buyers would pay the same or less without a HFT middleman jumping into the trade between milliseconds.

HFT is turning modern commodity and stock markets into a farce. Sooner or later, buyers and sellers are going to take their balls and go home.

... and transactions costs go up for everyone.

You keep repeating this, but the statement is directly at odds with the reality of a growing and profitable HFT industry. If transaction costs are going down, then how are HFT companies making so much money?

The actual reality is:
a) Millisecond HFTs have no effect on transaction costs vs 1 sec transaction speeds, and
b) HFTs make money by reducing value for the slower buyers and sellers at the stock exchange. Buyers pay more, and sellers get less for the same stock than they would if HFT trading did not exist.

You can jaw on about liquidity and transaction costs all you want. But the money that HFT is making has to come from somewhere. These companies do not add value, or provide services. As such the profits they make come from companies which do.

For all practical purposes, the HFTers are the exchange.

Except for the rest of the marks -- or "traders" as they were once known -- without whom HFT companies would have no-one to scrape all those pennies from.

It's the Ryanair, low cost airline effect. It's all about the price, squeeze every penny, charge for baggage, (pretend to) charge for toilet usage, just get them from A to B for the minimum advertised price and them make them pay for it in discomfort, inconvenience, or extra charges later.

And there's something to be said for this model. It has brought affordable, regular, international, air travel to the masses -- for the prices mentioned above.

But, look, let me put it this way: I will pay the extra â100 or even â200 euros per flight to fly with Aer Lingus or BA, in some modicum of comfort, without the mental overhead of restrictions, and to be dropped off in an actual city instead of an airport 80km from where I want to go. There are limits to how low people will go for the right price and I think the airline industry has already hit that mark.

And it will be your fault.

While the general contempt being spat in the above post is rather direction-less, I feel that this statement at least is accurate. It is "our" (collective computerdom's) fault that the internet is being turned into a giant walled garden surrounded by watch towers.

The web needed technologies that put decentralisation, anonymity, and encryption into the hands of every single user by default. That never happened. It never happened because hackers did not
a) Write such software, or write such addons to existing software, and
b) Never pushed for such software to be written or included.

Where's the button on Firefox that turns on -- no, turns off from default -- encrypted browsing? Where's the auto-configured PGP setting in _all_ email clients, ready to send and receive encrypted mail by default? Where are the default sever settings in programs like Apache which support all of this across the web?

These things are no longer optional extras. In the face of the rumbling, Kafka-esque behemoth that the NSA is becoming, they are essential features which everyone on the web needs right now.

The first task: Get Firefox to accept self-signed certs without complaining.

People don't seem that outraged because of the enormity of what they have been faced with.

The size, scale, scope, and capability of the NSA domestic survellance programs literally surpass the wildest dreams of secret police organisations like the Stazi. Snowden's revelations have dropped an undeniable bombshell on the US public, which despite its best efforts to ignore, not even the mainstream media can completely hush up. American's now know that they are under 24/7/365 complete and total government survellance each and every time they go online. Everything they do is monitored, recorded, and kept on file for the rest of their lives.

It takes time for a human being to fully come to terms with something like this.

For American's, it will taken even longer. The idea of a free America is still a very powerful one. The idea that certain things don't happen in America is a founding principle of the nation, and the reason why so many millions chose to build a new life there. The idea that a secret police -- the most quintessential aspect of an oppressive state -- now exists in the US on a scale never before seen in human history is an idea in fundamental conflict with American's own national self-image. It would be easier to accept that the individual states never actually existed than to accept this.

But facts are stubborn things. Despite all efforts to smother it, this story is not going away, and American's are not going to be able to ignore it. This is too huge. The NSA and it's programs are a sledgehammer, slowly pounding at the very foundations of the US itself. No matter how asleep, how apathetic, how cynical, or how uniformed you are, eventually the punding is going to wake you up too.

And yet Firefox will still scream blue murder if you so much as attempt to open a https page with a self signed cert.

More and more, I wonder about the real reasons behinds Mozilla's decision to declare an encrypted web off bounds.

What the hell is the NSA being paid to do? Right now they're spending money, manpower and resources on trolling the internet for people's buddy lists and address books. For what? Because some terrorist might spill the beans on his super plans over AIM?

This is getting ridiculous. The NSA has clearly become a giant black hole of money which can and will hire an office full of people, a warehouse of computer equipment, and a 20 year maintenance plan just to keep tabs on who is sending instant messages to who -- foreign or domestic.

This isn't 1984 anymore. It's Brazil. I'm sure the NSA would like to think of themselves as Information Retrieval, but in reality they more resemble the Department of Records, no doubt complete with busy-seeming employees goofing off for most of the day.

You have no idea what you're talking about. Ape escape used the right stick to control the items, and the left stick for movement. It worked like the twin stick "asteroids" style games out now.

Twin stick control was an entirely new concept for console players at the time. Forget about 4 way buttons -- this took getting used to. After a few years, game developers then seemed to hit upon the idea of using the stick for the camera.

By now, we're all accustomed to this convention. But in 1998-1999, using a stick for a camera was a largely unheard of concept. Camera control was via shoulder buttons on 4 way buttons, and was a genuine nightmare. Third person 3D games never really became smoothly playable until the genuine innovation of the camera control stick.

And no, neither Ape escape nor Mario 64 did not employed this convention.

Article overlooks the other big backdoor which was installed in 2003: SELinux.

I still have no idea why my kernel would need an internal firewall, but I do know why the NSA would want to install one in mine and everyone elses'. Exactly how many more NSA scandals do we require before this "feature" is rolled back?

I'm sorry, this story is about US Adult test scores. Could you take your derailment discussion somewhere else please.

An IBM developed Jeopardy playing supercomputer. A popular TV game show in which players must give the questions corresponding to a displayed answer.

Maybe.

42.