The OP is suggesting that many on this site do not have a background that renders them capable of participating in the debate.
If people need a "background" (beyond a decent general education) to discuss your art, your art sucks: it is ipso facto a game for a self-satisfied group of mutual admirers, a pseudo-intellectual circle-jerk
"How clever of you, oh Artist, to create a piece that only makes sense to those of us intimately familiar with Frazer's The Golden Bough and with the films of Jean-Luc Godard!" "Oh, how clever of you, oh Audience, to pick up the references I concealed in my work!"
We are already over-supplied with terrible art, that which has nothing to say and attempts to compensate by saying it obscurely.
Is this such as case? Dunno.